Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39174908›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2024

CD19 CAR T cells for B cell malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis focused on clinical impacts of CAR structural domains, manufacturing conditions, cellular product, doses, patient's age, and tumor types.

Erik Montagna, Najla Santos Pacheco de Campos, Victoria Alves Porto, Giselle Correia Próspero da Silva, Eloah Rabello Suarez

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Beyond the infusion: nursing at the vanguard of cytokine release syndrome rescue in CAR-T cell therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erik MontagnaCentro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, 09060-870, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6834-0261
Najla Santos Pacheco de CamposCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC, Santo Andre, 09210-580, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2019-5947
Victoria Alves PortoCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC, Santo Andre, 09210-580, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3640-427X
Giselle Correia Próspero da SilvaCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC, Santo Andre, 09210-580, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5679-9734
Eloah Rabello SuarezCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC, Santo Andre, 09210-580, SP, Brazil. eloah.suarez@ufabc.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0521-1056

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 143179/2021-7; 140514/2022-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/17656-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) T cells are one of the most remarkable cellular therapies for managing B cell malignancies. However, long-term disease-free survival is still a challenge to overcome. Here, we evaluated the influence of different hinge, transmembrane (TM), and costimulatory CAR domains, as well as manufacturing conditions, cellular product type, doses, patient's age, and tumor types on the clinical outcomes of patients with B cell cancers treated with CD19 CAR T cells. The primary outcome was defined as the best complete response (BCR), and the secondary outcomes were the best objective response (BOR) and 12-month overall survival (OS). The covariates considered were the type of hinge, TM, and costimulatory domains in the CAR, CAR T cell manufacturing conditions, cell population transduced with the CAR, the number of CAR T cell infusions, amount of CAR T cells injected/Kg, CD19 CAR type (name), tumor type, and age. Fifty-six studies (3493 patients) were included in the systematic review and 46 (3421 patients) in the meta-analysis. The overall BCR rate was 56%, with 60% OS and 75% BOR. Younger patients displayed remarkably higher BCR prevalence without differences in OS. The presence of CD28 in the CAR's hinge, TM, and costimulatory domains improved all outcomes evaluated. Doses from one to 4.9 million cells/kg resulted in better clinical outcomes. Our data also suggest that regardless of whether patients have had high objective responses, they might have survival benefits from CD19 CAR T therapy. This meta-analysis is a critical hypothesis-generating instrument, capturing effects in the CD19 CAR T cells literature lacking randomized clinical trials and large observational studies.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD19Immunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAge FactorsHumansLeukemia, B-CellLymphoma, B-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesTreatment OutcomeAntigens, CD19Receptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric Antigen4-1BBCAR T cell doseCAR T cells manufacturing conditionsCD28CD8Clinical response CAR T cellsCostimulatory domainHingeTransmembrane

Identifiers

PMID39174908
PMCPMC11340198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.