ReviewThe AAPS journal2024
Mass Balance in Pharmaceutical Stress Testing: A Review of Principles and Practical Applications.
Review in The AAPS journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polymer- and Lipid-Based Nanostructures for Wound Healing with Barrier-Resolved Design.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress testing (also known as forced degradation) of pharmaceutical drug substances and products is a critical part of the drug development process, providing insight into the degradation pathways of drug substances and drug products. This information is used to support the development of stability-indicating methods (SIMs) capable of detecting pharmaceutically relevant degradation products that might potentially be observed during manufacturing, long-term storage, distribution, and use. Assessing mass balance of stressed samples is a key aspect of developing SIMs and is a regulatory expectation. However, the approaches to measure, calculate, and interpret mass balance can vary among different pharmaceutical companies. Such disparities also pose difficulties for health authorities when reviewing mass balance assessments, which may result in the potential delay of drug application approvals. The authors have gathered input from 10 pharma companies to map out a practical review of science-based approaches and technical details to assess and interpret mass balance results. Key concepts of mass balance are introduced, various mass balance calculations are demonstrated, and recommendations on how to investigate poor mass balance results are presented using real-world case studies. Herein we provide a single source reference on the topic of mass balance in pharmaceutical forced degradation for small molecule drug substances and drug products in support of regulatory submissions with the goal of facilitating a shared understanding among pharmaceutical scientists and health authorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39174806What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.