ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2024
[Loneliness in Germany-prevalence, development over time, and regional differences].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global and regional trends in psoriasis burden (1990-2021): age patterns and socio-demographic associations.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Social anxiety and smartphone addiction among college students: the mediating role of loneliness.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLoneliness is widespread and has negative health consequences. The present study seeks to answer the following questions: (1) how many people in Germany are highly lonely, (2) how has loneliness changed in Germany over time-in particular with regard to the COVID-19 pandemic, and (3) how is loneliness distributed regionally in Germany today?
methodsThe present study uses data from the 2013, 2017, and 2021 waves of the Socio-Economic Panel, a population representative panel study from Germany. Based on the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) loneliness scale, we estimate prevalences for high loneliness for different risk groups in Germany. Further, using multi-level models, we estimate the changes in loneliness from 2013 to 2021. Finally, we generate regional maps to display the relative regional distribution of loneliness in Germany over the three assessment waves.
resultsThe results show that around 2% of all people living in Germany are highly lonely, and this proportion has not changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, mean overall loneliness in Germany increased in the last decade, particularly during the pandemic. Additionally, the regional distribution of loneliness also changed. While eastern Germany was particularly affected by loneliness in 2013, western Lower Saxony, Rhineland-Palatine, and Hesse were the most affected regions during the pandemic. DISCUSSION: Reasons for these changes could be structural changes in the German society over the past 10 years or the COVID-19 pandemic and the different measures implemented to combat the spread of the COVID-19 virus. However, since the latest representative data on loneliness stems from 2021, further data collection is urgently needed to depict the current state of loneliness in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.