Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39174764›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024

Long-term results after medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction for the treatment of patellofemoral instability.

Vittorio Davidoni, Piero Agostinone, Giacomo Dal Fabbro, Gian Andrea Lucidi, Emanuele Altovino, Alberto Grassi, Stefano Zaffagnini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vittorio DavidoniClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, c/o Lab Biomeccanica ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Via Cesare Pupilli 1, Bologna, Italy.
Piero AgostinoneClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, c/o Lab Biomeccanica ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Via Cesare Pupilli 1, Bologna, Italy. piero.agostinone@ior.it.
Giacomo Dal FabbroClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, c/o Lab Biomeccanica ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Via Cesare Pupilli 1, Bologna, Italy.
Gian Andrea LucidiClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, c/o Lab Biomeccanica ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Via Cesare Pupilli 1, Bologna, Italy.
Emanuele AltovinoClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, c/o Lab Biomeccanica ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Via Cesare Pupilli 1, Bologna, Italy.
Alberto GrassiClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, c/o Lab Biomeccanica ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Via Cesare Pupilli 1, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano ZaffagniniClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, c/o Lab Biomeccanica ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Via Cesare Pupilli 1, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate long-term clinical outcomes and redislocation rate after medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 26 knees with mean age 26.3 ± 10.6 years (25 patients, 7 males and 18 females) treated for patellar instability (at least two objective dislocations) with medialization of the patellar tendon medial third were evaluated with an intermediate clinical follow-up (FU) at a mean of 6.5 ± 2.1 years and with a final telephone interview follow-up at mean of 15.6 ± 2.5 years (11.4-20.1). Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Kujala, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and Tegner activity scores were used. Information about further redislocation and knee surgery was also collected.

resultsAll the clinical scores had a significant improvement compared to preoperative status (WOMAC pre-op 55.9 ± 27.2 vs. WOMAC final FU 80.8 ± 22.2; KUJALA pre-op 41.0 ± 24.0 vs. KUJALA final FU 77.2 ± 24.1; VAS pre-op 6.0 ± 3.1 vs. VAS final FU 3.44 ± 2.35; TEGNER pre-op 2.1 ± 2.0 vs. TEGNER final FU 3.6 ± 1.8; p < 0.001), and the outcomes remained stable at the final follow-up compared to the intermediate follow-up (p > 0.05). A total of 4 knees had at least one redislocation at the final follow-up, while 3 knees underwent total knee replacement surgery. The redislocation-survival rate at 5 years is 92%, meanwhile is 84% at 10 and 15 years.

conclusionsMPTL reconstruction produced good clinical results and a survival rate of 84% at a mean of 16 years follow-up and could be considered as associated procedure in case of patellofemoral instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityLigaments, ArticularPatellofemoral JointAdolescentAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultKnee reconstructive surgeryMPTL reconstructionPatellar dislocationPatellar instability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.