Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39174754›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hematology2024

MDS patient registries - achievements and challenges.

Tilman Steinmetz, Uwe Totzke, Annika Kasprzak, Stephan Schmitz, Norbert Gattermann, Ulrich Germing

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tilman SteinmetzOutpatient Clinics for Hematology and Oncology, Sachsenring 69, 50677, Cologne, Germany. steinmetz@oncokoeln.de.
Uwe TotzkeTotzke & Dreher Scientific (TDS), Basel, Switzerland.
Annika KasprzakClinic for Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Stephan SchmitzOutpatient Clinics for Hematology and Oncology, Sachsenring 69, 50677, Cologne, Germany.
Norbert GattermannClinic for Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Ulrich GermingClinic for Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the late 1980s, patient registries have played a pivotal role in the elucidation of rare diseases. For myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), they revealed the disease actually to be diverse rather than rare. Registry data enabled the definition of various MDS subtypes and prognostic scores tailoring therapy. These classifications have been revised and refined several times, and the differential diagnosis of MDS has become increasingly complex. At the same time, the diagnosis has been made more commonly and no longer by specialized centers of expertise only. Consequently, several registries have collected data with different focuses and from different patient subpopulations. The current review presents three MDS registries and their rationale, scope, design, and achievements. All three complement each other and will remain a mainstay to advance the knowledge on MDS as well as to validate the outcomes of clinical trials. However, delineation of subtypes after the most recent WHO and IPC revisions, as well as the determination of the newest risk score M of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M), no longer just shift cut-offs but are based on multivariate compilations of highly specific genetic information. This paradigm shift involves challenging registries with respect to the assignment of all patients for whom this information has not yet been available.

Indexed as

Myelodysplastic SyndromesRegistriesHumansPrognosisMyelodysplastic neoplasia (MDS)Non-interventional studies (NIS)Registries

Identifiers

PMID39174754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.