Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39174736›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

A portable and efficient dementia screening tool using eye tracking machine learning and virtual reality.

Ying Xu, Chi Zhang, Baobao Pan, Qing Yuan, Xu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Detecting Alzheimer's disease using digital virtual reality cognitive tests.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Precision neuropsychology in the area of AI.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying Xu *Shenzhen Bao'an Centre for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, PR China.
Chi Zhang *Shenzhen Yiwei Technology, Shenzhen, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3895-7949
Baobao PanShenzhen Yiwei Technology, Shenzhen, PR China.
Qing YuanShenzhen Bao'an Centre for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, PR China. 554208737@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5519-0381
Xu ZhangNational Engineering Laboratory for Big Data System Computing Technology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, PR China. zhangxu880605@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4803-8628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia represents a significant global health challenge, with early screening during the preclinical stage being crucial for effective management. Traditional diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease, the most common form of dementia, are limited by cost and invasiveness. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a precursor to dementia, is currently identified through neuropsychological tests like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), which are not suitable for large-scale screening. Eye-tracking technology, capturing and quantifying eye movements related to cognitive behavior, has emerged as a promising tool for cognitive assessment. Subtle changes in eye movements could serve as early indicators of MCI. However, the interpretation of eye-tracking data is challenging. This study introduced a dementia screening tool, VR Eye-tracking Cognitive Assessment (VECA), using eye-tracking technology, machine learning, and virtual reality (VR) to offer a non-invasive, efficient alternative capable of large-scale deployment. VECA was conducted with 201 participants from Shenzhen Baoan Chronic Hospital, utilizing eye-tracking data captured via VR headsets to predict MoCA scores and classify cognitive impairment across different educational backgrounds. The support vector regression model employed demonstrated a high correlation (0.9) with MoCA scores, significantly outperforming baseline models. Furthermore, it established optimal cut-off scores for identifying cognitive impairment with notable sensitivity (88.5%) and specificity (83%). This study underscores VECA's potential as a portable, efficient tool for early dementia screening, highlighting the benefits of integrating eye-tracking technology, machine learning, and VR in cognitive health assessments.

Identifiers

PMID39174736
PMCPMC11341897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.