Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39174730›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Evaluating the clinical utility of cervical cultures in postpartum endometritis management.

Nir Meller, Ronen Fluss, Sharon Amit

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nir MellerThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Faculty of Medicine, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-GanTel-Aviv, Israel. Nirmeller1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6250-4202
Ronen FlussThe Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sharon AmitClinical Microbiology, The Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the utility of cervical cultures in the diagnosis and management of postpartum endometritis.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 1069 cervical cultures collected from postpartum women with suspected endometritis between 2011 and 2021. Patient demographics, obstetric history, clinical parameters, and culture results were analyzed. Microorganisms were categorized into five groups based on species and virulence. Statistical analysis was performed to identify associations between risk factors, pathogens, and disease severity.

resultsThe positivity rate for distinct microorganisms in cervical cultures was 33.1%. Escherichia coli (10.8%) and Group B Streptococcus (7.5%) were the most common isolates. Prolonged labor duration and prolonged rupture of membranes were associated with Enterobacterales infections. Elevated white blood cell count was linked to Enterobacterales and beta-hemolytic Streptococci, while the former were also associated with higher rate of postpartum clinic visit. No significant differences in disease severity were found between other microorganism groups.

conclusionThe study suggests that while cervical cultures can identify potential pathogens in postpartum endometritis, their clinical utility is questionable due to the polymicrobial nature of the disease and the isolation of commensal microorganisms. The lack of significant differences in disease severity across various microorganism groups raises questions regarding the contribution of distinct bacterial identification in endometritis management.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriEndometritisAdultEscherichia coliFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPuerperal DisordersRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexEndometritisInfectionsMicrobiologyPostpartum

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.