Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39174691›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine experimental2024

The physiological basis for individualized oxygenation targets in critically ill patients with circulatory shock.

Anne-Aylin Sigg, Vanja Zivkovic, Jan Bartussek, Reto A Schuepbach, Can Ince, Matthias P Hilty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne-Aylin SiggInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. anne-aylin.sigg@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3896-8021
Vanja ZivkovicInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jan BartussekInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Reto A SchuepbachInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Can InceDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthias P HiltyInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculatory shock, defined as decreased tissue perfusion, leading to inadequate oxygen delivery to meet cellular metabolic demands, remains a common condition with high morbidity and mortality. Rapid restitution and restoration of adequate tissue perfusion are the main treatment goals. To achieve this, current hemodynamic strategies focus on adjusting global physiological variables such as cardiac output (CO), hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, and arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SaO PHYSIOLOGICAL PREMISES: Oxygen must reach the tissue to enable oxidative phosphorylation. The human body timely detects hypoxia via different mechanisms aiming to maintain adequate tissue oxygenation. In contrast to the pulmonary circulation, where the main response to hypoxia is arteriolar vasoconstriction, the regulatory mechanisms of the systemic circulation aim to optimize oxygen availability in the tissues. This is achieved by increasing the capillary density in the microcirculation and the capillary hematocrit thereby increasing the capacity of oxygen diffusion from the red blood cells to the tissue. Hyperoxia, on the other hand, is associated with oxygen radical production, promoting cell death. CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH: Clinical trials in critically ill patients have primarily focused on comparing macrocirculatory endpoints and outcomes based on stroke volume and oxygenation targets. Some earlier studies have indicated potential benefits of conservative oxygenation. Recent trials show contradictory results regarding mortality, organ dysfunction, and ventilatory-free days. Empirical studies comparing various targets for SaO CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: To optimize risk-benefit ratio of resuscitation measures in critically ill patients with circulatory shock in addition to individual targets for CO and Hb concentration, a primary aim should be to restore tissue perfusion and avoid hyperoxia. In the future, an individualized approach with microcirculatory targets will become increasingly relevant. Further studies are needed to define optimal targets.

Indexed as

Blood transfusionCirculatory shockCritical careHyperoxiaHypoxiaMicrocirculationOxygenResuscitationTissue oxygenationTissue perfusion

Identifiers

PMID39174691
PMCPMC11341514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.