ArticleJournal of human hypertension2024
Chronic hypertension diagnosed before or during pregnancy and its effects on pregnancy outcomes.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Blood pressure-lowering treatment for pregnant women with non-severe hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- The effectiveness of 100 mg aspirin in preventing superimposed preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: a real-world study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic hypertension (CH) during pregnancy, identified before or within the first 20 weeks, presents varying risks depending on the timing of diagnosis. This real-world study was conducted from January 2018 to June 2023 and included singleton pregnancies with CH to compare pre-pregnancy CH (Group 1) and newly diagnosed CH (Group 2). There were 565 women in the final analysis, with 307 in Group 1 with pre-pregnancy CH and 258 in Group 2 with new-onset CH. Those in Group 1 more frequently had pre-gestational diabetes and a history of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, whereas Group 2 had a higher incidence of excessive gestational weight gain. Notably, 56.2% of Group 2 patients did not receive antihypertensive treatment before 20 weeks, while the proportion was 36.2% in Group 1, resulting in a significant difference in baseline blood pressure. The study revealed higher incidences of preterm preeclampsia (44.2% vs. 34.9%) and placental abruption (5.4% vs. 2.0%) in Group 2 compared to Group 1. After adjustment, logistic regression indicated that Group 2 had a 1.8-fold higher risk of preterm preeclampsia than Group 1. These findings suggest that pregnant women newly diagnosed with CH in the first 20 weeks face increased adverse outcomes compared to those diagnosed before pregnancy. Intense monitoring and earlier intervention may help manage women with new-onset CH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39174670What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.