ArticleNature protocols2025
Native MS-guided lipidomics to define endogenous lipid microenvironments of eukaryotic receptors and transporters.
Article in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential lipid selectivity of StARD phospholipid transporters revealed by native MS.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Modulating pressure in the Orbitrap improves sensitivity and mass resolution in charge detection mass spectrometry.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Structure of NHE6 and its lipid-mediated interactions regulating endosomal pH.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Drug-Free Ultrasound-Responsive Mechanoluminescent Suture Enables On-Demand Antibacterial Therapy and Enhanced Healing of Infected Wounds.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Structural basis of PLPP3-mediated lipid phosphate dephosphorylation and its role in melanoma.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Deep Structural Characterization of Protein-Bound Lipids via Native MS and Ultraviolet Photodissociation.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Deciphering the language of mingling lipids and proteins.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mammalian membrane is composed of various eukaryotic lipids interacting with extensively post-translationally modified proteins. Probing interactions between these mammalian membrane proteins and their diverse and heterogeneous lipid cohort remains challenging. Recently, native mass spectrometry (MS) combined with bottom-up 'omics' approaches has provided valuable information to relate structural and functional lipids to membrane protein assemblies in eukaryotic membranes. Here we provide a step-by-step protocol to identify and provide relative quantification for endogenous lipids bound to mammalian membrane proteins and their complexes. Using native MS to guide our lipidomics strategies, we describe the necessary sample preparation steps, followed by native MS data acquisition, tailored lipidomics and data interpretation. We also highlight considerations for the integration of different levels of information from native MS and lipidomics and how to deal with the various challenges that arise during the experiments. This protocol begins with the preparation of membrane proteins from mammalian cells and tissues for native MS. The results enable not only direct assessment of copurified endogenous lipids but also determination of the apparent affinities of specific lipids. Detailed sample preparation for lipidomics analysis is also covered, along with comprehensive settings for liquid chromatography-MS analysis. This protocol is suitable for the identification and quantification of endogenous lipids, including fatty acids, sterols, glycerolipids, phospholipids and glycolipids and can be used to interrogate proteins from recombinant sources to native membranes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39174660What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.