Observational studyScientific reports2024
Observational study of intracranial compliance analysis in neurologically healthy pediatric patients using a non-invasive device.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Neurological and Hemodynamics Safety of an Airway Clearance Technique in Patients with Acute Brain Injury: An Analysis of Intracranial Pressure Pulse Morphology Using a Non-Invasive Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Trial
- Non-invasive intracranial pressure estimation in the intensive care unit: narrative review of methods and clinical applications.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Information about the morphology of the intracranial pressure waveform, as well as the variations in intracranial pressure (ICP) and compliance in pediatric patients are essential to diagnose and predict the progression of various neurological conditions. However, there is no information on the morphology of the IP waveform in neurologically healthy pediatric patients. In the present study, intracranial compliance was therefore analyzed in neurologically healthy patients with the aid of a noninvasive device. The study was an observational, cross-sectional study. Fifty-five neurologically healthy participants were included. Data on intracranial compliance with the patient in two positions, lying down (0°) and seated (45°), were collected with a noninvasive extracranial sensor, which allowed the intracranial pressure waveforms to be recorded. The values of the ratio P2/P1 were then analyzed. A questionnaire (with a scale from zero to ten, where ten corresponds to the highest level of satisfaction) was applied for patients to evaluate their satisfaction with the sensor. Patients were 10 years old (average), and most of them were (58%). Mean P2/P1 ratio was 0.94 (sd = 0.14) in the supine position and 0.91 (sd = 0.15) in the seated position. Participants were satisfied with the length of time for which the equipment was used (9.8, sd = 0.71). The device did not cause any discomfort. The noninvasive method used was well accepted by the patients. Intracranial compliance values were determined by analysis of the P2/P1 ratio in neurologically healthy pediatric population.Trial registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: RBR-5j74ddg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.