Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39174582›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2024

Tumour lysis syndrome.

Scott C Howard, Anna Avagyan, Biruh Workeneh, Ching-Hon Pui

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Macrophages sense and follow physiologically relevant KCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Rasburicase vs. allopurinol: mortality in hematological malignancies post anti-hyperuricemic therapy - real-world study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott C HowardResonance, Memphis, TN, USA. Scott.Howard@ResonanceHealth.org.
Anna AvagyanYeolyan Center for Hematology and Oncology, Yerevan, Armenia.
Biruh WorkenehUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ching-Hon PuiDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. Ching-Hon.Pui@stjude.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0303-5658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) represents a critical oncological emergency characterized by extensive tumour cell breakdown, leading to the swift release of intracellular contents into the systemic circulation, outpacing homeostatic mechanisms. This process results in hyperuricaemia (a by-product of intracellular DNA release), hyperkalaemia, hyperphosphataemia, hypocalcaemia and the accumulation of xanthine. These electrolyte and metabolic imbalances pose a significant risk of acute kidney injury, cardiac arrhythmias, seizures, multiorgan failure and, rarely, death. While TLS can occur spontaneously, it usually arises shortly after the initiation of effective treatment, particularly in patients with a large cancer cell mass (defined as ≥500 g or ≥300 g/m

Indexed as

AllopurinolTumor Lysis SyndromeHumansHyperkalemiaHyperuricemiaNeoplasmsUrate OxidaseUric AcidXanthineAllopurinolrasburicaseUrate OxidaseUric AcidXanthine

Identifiers

PMID39174582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.