Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39174576›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

Long-term clinical recovery and treatment resistance in first-episode psychosis: a 10-year follow-up study.

Kristin Fjelnseth Wold, Isabel Viola Kreis, Gina Åsbø, Camilla Bärthel Flaaten, Line Widing, Magnus Johan Engen, Siv Hege Lyngstad, Erik Johnsen, Torill Ueland, Carmen Simonsen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kristin Fjelnseth WoldInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. k.f.wold@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-6010
Isabel Viola KreisInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-699X
Gina ÅsbøDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Department of Research and Innovation, Section for Clinical Psychosis Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Camilla Bärthel FlaatenDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Department of Research and Innovation, Section for Clinical Psychosis Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Line WidingInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Magnus Johan EngenDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Nydalen District Psychiatric Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5080-7011
Siv Hege LyngstadDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Nydalen District Psychiatric Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Erik JohnsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Torill UelandDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Department of Research and Innovation, Section for Clinical Psychosis Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Carmen SimonsenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid MelleInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9783-548X

Funding

Ministry of Health and Care Services | Helse Sør-Øst RHF (Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority) #2006233, #2006258, #2011085, #2014102, #2015088Norges Forskningsråd (Research Council of Norway) #223273/F50Norges Forskningsråd (Research Council of Norway) #287714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Illness trajectories in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) vary significantly over time. Identifying early-course parameters predicting outcomes is essential, but long-term data still needs to be provided. We conducted a 10-year follow-up study of a comprehensive first-episode psychosis (FEP) cohort investigating the prevalence of clinical recovery (CR) and treatment resistance (TR) after ten years, as well as clinical, demographic, and pre-illness predictors of long-term outcomes. 102 participants with FEP DSM-IV Schizophrenia spectrum disorders were recruited within their first year of treatment. The Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis Working Group (TRRIP) and the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) criteria were used to define TR and CR, respectively. At 10-year follow-up, 29 (29%) of the participants were classified as in CR, while 32 (31%) were classified as TR. We also identified a larger middle group (n = 41, 40%) consisting of participants in partial recovery. 7% of all participants had tried Clozapine at the 10-year follow-up. Logistic regression analyses identified insidious onset (OR = 4.16) and baseline disorganized symptoms (OR = 2.96) as significantly associated with an increased risk of developing TR. Good premorbid academic adjustment (OR = 1.60) and acute onset (OR = 3.40) were associated with an increased chance of CR. We identified three long-term outcome groups by using recent consensus definitions. We also identified the potential importance of assessing baseline disorganized symptoms and monitoring patients with insidious onset more closely. Further, the findings suggest that clinicians should pay close attention to early-course parameters and provide adequate treatment to improve long-term outcomes of FEP.

Identifiers

PMID39174576
PMCPMC11341913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.