ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhancing colorectal cancer histology diagnosis using modified deep neural networks optimizer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ensemble of Handcrafted and Learned Features for Colorectal Cancer Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Compact deep learning models for colon histopathology focusing performance and generalization challenges.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fusion of classical and deep learning features with incremental learning for improved classification of lung and colon cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A dual enhanced stochastic gradient descent method with dynamic momentum and step size adaptation for improved optimization performance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Accurate colorectal cancer detection using a random hinge exponential distribution coupled attention network on pathological images.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of colorectal cancer using residual transformer with mixed attention and explainable AI.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimizers are the bottleneck of the training process of any Convolutionolution neural networks (CNN) model. One of the critical steps when work on CNN model is choosing the optimal optimizer to solve a specific problem. Recent challenge in nowadays researches is building new versions of traditional CNN optimizers that can work more efficient than the traditional optimizers. Therefore, this work proposes a novel enhanced version of Adagrad optimizer called SAdagrad that avoids the drawbacks of Adagrad optimizer in dealing with tuning the learning rate value for each step of the training process. In order to evaluate SAdagrad, this paper builds a CNN model that combines a fine- tuning technique and a weight decay technique together. It trains the proposed CNN model on Kather colorectal cancer histology dataset which is one of the most challenging datasets in recent researches of Diagnose of Colorectal Cancer (CRC). In fact, recently, there have been plenty of deep learning models achieving successful results with regard to CRC classification experiments. However, the enhancement of these models remains challenging. To train our proposed model, a learning transfer process, which is adopted from a pre-complicated defined model is applied to the proposed model and combined it with a regularization technique that helps in avoiding overfitting. The experimental results show that SAdagrad reaches a remarkable accuracy (98%), when compared with Adaptive momentum optimizer (Adam) and Adagrad optimizer. The experiments also reveal that the proposed model has a more stable training and testing processes, can reduce the overfitting problem in multiple epochs and can achieve a higher accuracy compared with previous researches on Diagnosis CRC using the same Kather colorectal cancer histology dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.