ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2024
Assessing structural uncertainty of biochemical regulatory networks in metabolic pathways under varying data quality.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-cell and cell-free biosensor-driven metabolic engineering.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2025Review
- Seven critical challenges in synthetic one-carbon assimilation and their potential solutions.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ordinary differential equation (ODE) models are powerful tools for studying the dynamics of metabolic pathways. However, key challenges lie in constructing ODE models for metabolic pathways, specifically in our limited knowledge about which metabolite levels control which reaction rates. Identification of these regulatory networks is further complicated by the limited availability of relevant data. Here, we assess the conditions under which it is feasible to accurately identify regulatory networks in metabolic pathways by computationally fitting candidate network models with biochemical systems theory (BST) kinetics to data of varying quality. We use network motifs commonly found in metabolic pathways as a simplified testbed. Key features correlated with the level of difficulty in identifying the correct regulatory network were identified, highlighting the impact of sampling rate, data noise, and data incompleteness on structural uncertainty. We found that for a simple branched network motif with an equal number of metabolites and fluxes, identification of the correct regulatory network can be largely achieved and is robust to missing one of the metabolite profiles. However, with a bi-substrate bi-product reaction or more fluxes than metabolites in the network motif, the identification becomes more challenging. Stronger regulatory interactions and higher metabolite concentrations were found to be correlated with less structural uncertainty. These results could aid efforts to predict whether the true metabolic regulatory network can be computationally identified for a given stoichiometric network topology and dataset quality, thus helping to identify optimal measures to mitigate such identifiability issues in kinetic model development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.