ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2024
Multiparametric Ultrasound Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using Deep Neural Networks.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developments in Ultrasound-Based Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection.The Prostate · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA deep neural network (DNN) was trained to generate a multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS) volume from four input ultrasound-based modalities (acoustic radiation force impulse [ARFI] imaging, shear wave elasticity imaging [SWEI], quantitative ultrasound-midband fit [QUS-MF], and B-mode) for the detection of prostate cancer.
methodsA DNN was trained using co-registered ARFI, SWEI, MF, and B-mode data obtained in men with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy (15 subjects, comprising 980,620 voxels). Data were obtained using a commercial scanner that was modified to allow user control of the acoustic beam sequences and provide access to the raw image data. For each subject, the index lesion and a non-cancerous region were manually segmented using visual confirmation based on whole-mount histopathology data.
resultsIn a prostate phantom, the DNN increased lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) compared to a previous approach that used a linear support vector machine (SVM). In the in vivo test datasets (n = 15), the DNN-based mpUS volumes clearly portrayed histopathology-confirmed prostate cancer and significantly improved CNR compared to the linear SVM (2.79 ± 0.88 vs. 1.98 ± 0.73, paired-sample t-test p < 0.001). In a sub-analysis in which the input modalities to the DNN were selectively omitted, the CNR decreased with fewer inputs; both stiffness- and echogenicity-based modalities were important contributors to the multiparametric model.
conclusionThe findings from this study indicate that a DNN can be optimized to generate mpUS prostate volumes with high CNR from ARFI, SWEI, MF, and B-mode and that this approach outperforms a linear SVM approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.