SynthesisHeart (British Cardiac Society)2024
Long-term risk of heart failure in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association Between Cancer Incidence and Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prognostic Impact of Cancer in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A transformer-based survival model for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure: a multi-cohort study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardio-Oncology: Real-World Evidence of Benefit in Cancer Patients with Heart Failure.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Article
- Optimizing Heart Failure-Specific Disease Management Programs and Patient Care in Saudi Arabia: A Saudi Heart Association Position Statement.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2026Article
- Baseline vs. on-treatment heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in a real world cardio-oncology clinic: observational analysis of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity incidence and cancer treatment implications.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in cancer patients and survivors. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC and the ESC Council of Cardio-Oncology.European journal of heart failure · 2025Article
- Monitoring high-risk patients for chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity: A retrospective analysis.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Tumour necrosis factor-Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Cancer survivorship in low- and middle-income countries: challenges, needs, and emerging support strategies.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer survivors are at increased risk of heart failure (HF). While cardiotoxicity is commonly sought at the time of cancer chemotherapy, HF develops as a result of multiple 'hits' over time, and there is limited evidence regarding the frequency and causes of HF during survivorship.
objectivesThis systematic review sought to investigate the relationship between cardiotoxic cancer therapies and HF during survivorship.
methodsWe searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases for studies reporting HF in adult survivors (≥50 years old), who were ≥5 years postpotential cardiotoxic cancer therapy. A random effects model was used to examine the associations of HF.
resultsThirteen papers were included, comprising 190 259 participants (mean age 53.5 years, 93% women). The risk of HF was increased (overall RR 1.47 (95% CI (1.17 to 1.86)). Cardiotoxic treatment, compared with cancer alone, provided a similar risk (RR of 1.46 (95% CI 0.98 to 2.16)). The overall HF incidence rate was 2.1% compared with 1.7% in the control arm-an absolute risk difference of 0.4%. In the breast cancer population ratio (11 studies), the overall HF RR was 2.57 (95% CI 1.35 to 4.90)). Although heterogeneity was significant (I
conclusionsHF is increased in adult cancer survivors, associated with cardiotoxic cancer therapy and standard risk factors. However, the small absolute risk difference between survivors and controls suggests that universal screening of survivors is unjustifiable. A risk model based on age, cardiotoxic cancer therapy and standard risk factors may facilitate a selective screening process in this at-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.