ArticleBMJ open2024
Scoping review of healthcare professionals' views on intimate partner violence in the Middle East and North Africa.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Factors and Outcomes of Premature Rupture of Membranes Among Women in the Middle East and North Africa: Mapping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of a Culturally Adapted WHO IPV Training for Thai Healthcare Providers: A Quasiexperimental Pilot Study.Nursing research and practice · 2025Article
- Breaking the cycle: addressing barriers to help-seeking and mental health impacts for male victims of intimate partner violence in low-and middle-income countries.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis scoping review aims to survey healthcare providers (HCPs) in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) about their knowledge, attitudes and barriers to working with women who have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV). This review aims to map the breadth of available peer-reviewed literature that may inform future educational training programmes.
designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: The scoping review included studies up to December 2023 from PUBMED, Medline, COCHRANE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO and Arabic medical journals. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Selected articles were restricted to those carried out in the MENA region, available in full text and with no date restrictions. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted from all studies to include research location, year of publication, type of journal, methodology, design, participants, knowledge, attitudes and barriers. By charting the information into a table, the data were analysed using frequency, counts and descriptive content analysis.
resultsOf the 1060 articles reviewed, 29 eligible studies were included in this scoping review. 27% of the articles reported HCPs' lack of knowledge about IPV protocols. The dominant attitude reported was a preference to treat the presenting health complaint and avoid discussing IPV. Finally, 30% of articles reported HCPs' lack of training as the main barrier.
conclusionOur paper concluded that there is a lack of research in understanding the knowledge, attitudes and barriers surrounding HCPs in the MENA region and IPV. This scoping review highlights the need for further research, informed interventions and training for HCPs in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.