Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39173947›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2024

Docking interactions determine substrate specificity of members of a widespread family of protein phosphatases.

Suhaily Caban-Penix, Kristin Ho, Zhewen Yang, Rishika Baral, Niels Bradshaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PHLPP is neither a Phosphatase nor a Tumor Suppressor.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. PHLPP2 is a pseudophosphatase that lost activity in the metazoan ancestor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suhaily Caban-PenixMolecular and Cell Biology Program, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Kristin HoDepartment of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Zhewen YangDepartment of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Rishika BaralDepartment of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA; Biochemistry and Biophysics Program, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Niels BradshawDepartment of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: niels@brandeis.edu.

Funding

GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL MECHANISMS OF REGULATIONT32GM007122 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LOVETT, SUSAN THOMAS · 1985 to 2020
$7.5M
Macromolecular Structure, Dynamics, and MechanismT32GM135126 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI JEFF GELLES, Douglas Lowell Theobald · 2020 to 2026
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007122NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How protein phosphatases achieve specificity for their substrates is a major outstanding question. PPM family serine/threonine phosphatases are widespread in bacteria and eukaryotes, where they dephosphorylate target proteins with a high degree of specificity. In bacteria, PPM phosphatases control diverse transcriptional responses by dephosphorylating anti-anti-sigma factors of the STAS domain family, exemplified by Bacillus subtilis phosphatases SpoIIE, which controls cell-fate during endospore formation, and RsbU, which initiates the general stress response. Using a combination of forward genetics, biochemical reconstitution, and AlphaFold2 structure prediction, we identified a conserved, tripartite substrate docking interface comprised of three variable loops on the surface of the PPM phosphatase domains of SpoIIE and RsbU that recognize the three-dimensional structure of the substrate protein. Nonconserved amino acids in these loops facilitate the accommodation of the cognate substrate and prevent dephosphorylation of the noncognate substrate. Together, single-amino acid substitutions in these three elements cause an over 500-fold change in specificity. Our data additionally suggest that substrate-docking interactions regulate phosphatase specificity through a conserved allosteric switch element that controls the catalytic efficiency of the phosphatase by positioning the metal cofactor and substrate. We hypothesize that this is a generalizable mechanistic model for PPM family phosphatase substrate specificity. Importantly, the substrate docking interface with the phosphatase is only partially overlapping with the much more extensive interface with the upstream kinase, suggesting the possibility that kinase and phosphatase specificity evolved independently.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesPhosphorylationSubstrate SpecificityBacterial ProteinsPhosphoprotein Phosphatasesalternative-sigma factoranti-sigma factorBacillus subtilisgeneral stress responsePPM phosphataseprotein phosphatasesporulationSTAS domainsubstrate specificity

Identifiers

PMID39173947
PMCPMC11418112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.