ArticleBrain stimulation
Genetic labeling of the nucleus of tractus solitarius neurons associated with electrical stimulation of the cervical or auricular vagus nerve in mice.
Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Requiring Mechanical Thrombectomy: Sham-Controlled, Randomised Device Trial.Translational stroke research · 2025Trial
- Auricular vagus nerve stimulation drives analgesia via an auricle-brain axis in a mouse model of neuropathic pain.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Electroacupuncture-based vagal stimulation attenuates epileptic seizures through a body-brain circuit.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Microglia alter autonomic nucleus neuronal activation after peripheral cytokine challenge.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026Article
- Vagus nerve stimulation alleviates S. aureus-induced mastitis by regulating gut microbiota S24-7-PPARγ and NF-ΚB/NLRP3 signaling in mice.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Article
- Vagus nerve stimulation as a predictive coding modulator that enhances feedforward over feedback transmission.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2025Review
- Gastroesophageal reflux-induced cough: the positive feedback loop of microaspiration and neurogenic inflammation.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionVagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is clinically useful for treating epilepsy, depression, and chronic pain. Currently, cervical VNS (cVNS) treatment is well-established, while auricular VNS (aVNS) is under development. Vagal stimulation regulates functions in diverse brain regions; therefore, it is critical to better understand how electrically-evoked vagal inputs following cVNS and aVNS engage with different brain regions.
objectiveAs vagus inputs are predominantly transmitted to the nucleus of tractus solitarius (NTS), we directly compared the activation of NTS neurons by cVNS or aVNS and the brain regions directly projected by the activated NTS neurons in mice.
methodsWe adopted the targeted recombination in active populations method, which allows for the activity-dependent, tamoxifen-inducible expression of mCherry-a reporter protein-in neurons specifically associated with cVNS or aVNS.
resultscVNS and aVNS induced comparable bilateral mCherry expressions in neurons within the NTS, especially in its caudal section (cNTS). However, the numbers of mCherry-expressing neurons within different subdivisions of cNTS was distinctive. In both cVNS and aVNS, anterogradely labeled mCherry-expressing axonal terminals were similarly observed across different areas of the forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain. These terminals were enriched in the rostral ventromedial medulla, parabrachial nucleus, periaqueductal gray, thalamic nuclei, central amygdala, and the hypothalamus. Sex difference of cVNS- and aVNS-induced labeling of NTS neurons was modest.
conclusionThe central projections of mCherry-expressing cNTS terminals are comparable between aVNS and cVNS, suggesting that cVNS and aVNS activate distinct but largely overlapping projections into the brain through the cNTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.