Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39173732›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2024

Associations Between Rehabilitation Utilization and Out-of-Pocket Costs Among Older Adults With Breast Cancer in the United States.

Rachelle Brick, Courtney P Williams, Luqin Deng, Michelle A Mollica, Nicole Stout, Jessica Gorzelitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachelle BrickDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Courtney P WilliamsDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL. Electronic address: courtneywilliams@uabmc.edu.
Luqin DengDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Michelle A MollicaDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Nicole StoutDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Health Policy, Management, and Leadership, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
Jessica GorzelitzDepartment of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032INCI NIH HHS L30 CA284498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association between rehabilitation utilization within 12 months of breast cancer diagnosis and out-of-pocket costs in the second year (12-24mo after diagnosis).

designSecondary analysis of the 2009-2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database. Individuals who received rehabilitation services were propensity-score matched to individuals who did not receive services. Overall and health care service-specific models were examined using generalized linear models with a gamma distribution.

settingInpatient and outpatient medical facilities.

participantsA total of 35,212 individuals diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer and were continuously enrolled in Medicare Fee-For Service (parts A, B, and D) in the 12 months before and 24 months postdiagnosis.

interventionNot applicable.

main outcome measuresIndividual cost responsibility, a proxy for out-of-pocket costs, which was defined as deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments during the second year after diagnosis (12-24mo postdiagnosis).

resultsThe mean individual cost responsibility was higher in individuals who used rehabilitation than those who did not ($4013 vs $3783), although it was not a clinically meaningful difference (d=0.06). Individuals who received rehabilitative services had significantly higher costs attributed to individual provider care ($1634 vs $1476), institutional outpatient costs ($886 vs $812), and prescription drugs ($959 vs $906), and significantly lower costs attributed to institutional inpatient costs ($455 vs $504), and durable medical equipment ($81 vs $86).

conclusionsOlder adults with breast cancer who received rehabilitation services had higher cost responsibility during the second year after diagnosis than those who did not. Future work is needed to examine the relationship between rehabilitation and out-of-pocket costs across longer periods of time and in conjunction with perceived benefit.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHealth ExpendituresMedicareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePropensity ScoreSEER ProgramUnited StatesBreast cancerHealth expendituresRehabilitationSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID39173732
PMCPMC11620952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.