Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39173561›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2024

Motivational dynamics of self-control.

Kaitlyn M Werner, Elliot T Berkman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaitlyn M WernerDepartment of Psychology and Center for Translational Neuroscience, University of Oregon, USA. Electronic address: kmwerner@uoregon.edu.
Elliot T BerkmanDepartment of Psychology and Center for Translational Neuroscience, University of Oregon, USA.

Funding

Supplement to Prevention Research Center: Parenting Among Women Who Are Opioid Users, Project 2P50DA048756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI MACKIEWICZ SEGHETE, KRISTEN L · 2019 to 2023
$18.0M
Construal level as a novel pathway for affect regulation and cancer controlR01CA240452 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI BERKMAN, ELLIOT TODD · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Devaluing Energy-Dense Foods for Cancer Control: Translational NeuroscienceR01CA211224 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI BERKMAN, ELLIOT TODD · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211224NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240452NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA048756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How people respond to desires varies substantially across time and situations. Building on recent theoretical developments, we propose that motivation plays a central role in the dynamics of self-control as it unfolds across time. We illustrate the role of motivation in self-control by highlighting evidence that pursuing goals for intrinsic (vs. extrinsic) reasons plays a key role in shaping when and how people engage in self-control in service to their goals. We then expand this framework by outlining several promising directions for future research, specifically emphasizing the dynamic interplay between motivation and self-control at various stages in the regulation process. Ultimately, we posit that motivation is a key factor in helping people flexibly regulate desires in accordance with situational demands.

Indexed as

GoalsMotivationSelf-ControlHumansDynamic processesFlexibilityGoalsMotivationSelf-controlSelf-regulation

Identifiers

PMID39173561
PMCPMC11423838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.