ArticlePloS one2024
Development and psychometric evaluation of the epilepsy lifestyle questionnaire.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy, particularly in older people, is associated with significant changes in physical activities, social and occupational functions, and diet. It is associated with significant changes in physical activities, social and occupational functions, and diet. Valid and reliable instruments are needed to assess these changes. This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess lifestyle in older people with epilepsy, named the Epilepsy Lifestyle Questionnaire (ELQ). This methodological study was conducted in 2022. The primary ELQ items were generated through reviewing the literature. Then, its face, content, construct, convergent, and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest stability were evaluated. Older patients aged ≥ 60 years were recruited from the Iranian Epilepsy Association to assess construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Data were analyzed using the SPSS (v. 26.0), AMOS (v. 24.0), and JASP software. The primary ELQ had 99 items with five subscales, namely health-oriented self-care, risk-averse behavior, emotional and psychosocial adaptation, epilepsy stigma, and intimacy and sexual behaviors. Sixty five items were deleted during psychometric evaluation. CFA showed the good fitting of the five-factor structure of the 34-item ELEQ (PCFI = 0.741, PNFI = 0.693, CMIN/DF = 0.073, IFI = 0.917, CFI = 0.916, AND GFI = 0.902). The values of internal consistency based on Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability based on intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of ELQ were 0.89 and 0.95, respectively. The ELQ is a valid and reliable self-report instrument. The results suggest that the ELQ is a useful clinical tool for assessing the lifestyle of patients with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.