ArticlePloS one2024
Proteome-scale prediction of molecular mechanisms underlying dominant genetic diseases.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of human missense variant effects from functional evidence.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Actually, what is a gain-of-function mutation?Genetics · 2026Article
- Integrating 730,947 exome sequences with clinical literature improves gene discovery.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Ensembl 2026.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Prevalence of loss-of-function, gain-of-function and dominant-negative mechanisms across genetic disease phenotypes.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Assessing variant effect predictors and disease mechanisms in intrinsically disordered proteins.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Genetic evidence informs the direction of therapeutic modulation in drug development.npj drug discovery · 2025Article
- Article
- Complementary Roles of Structure and Variant Effect Predictors in RyR1 Clinical Interpretation.Human mutation · 2025Article
- Protein structural context of cancer mutations reveals molecular mechanisms and candidate driver genes.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Curating genomic disease-gene relationships with Gene2Phenotype (G2P).Genome medicine · 2024Article
- Understanding the heterogeneous performance of variant effect predictors across human protein-coding genes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many dominant genetic disorders result from protein-altering mutations, acting primarily through dominant-negative (DN), gain-of-function (GOF), and loss-of-function (LOF) mechanisms. Deciphering the mechanisms by which dominant diseases exert their effects is often experimentally challenging and resource intensive, but is essential for developing appropriate therapeutic approaches. Diseases that arise via a LOF mechanism are more amenable to be treated by conventional gene therapy, whereas DN and GOF mechanisms may require gene editing or targeting by small molecules. Moreover, pathogenic missense mutations that act via DN and GOF mechanisms are more difficult to identify than those that act via LOF using nearly all currently available variant effect predictors. Here, we introduce a tripartite statistical model made up of support vector machine binary classifiers trained to predict whether human protein coding genes are likely to be associated with DN, GOF, or LOF molecular disease mechanisms. We test the utility of the predictions by examining biologically and clinically meaningful properties known to be associated with the mechanisms. Our results strongly support that the models are able to generalise on unseen data and offer insight into the functional attributes of proteins associated with different mechanisms. We hope that our predictions will serve as a springboard for researchers studying novel variants and those of uncertain clinical significance, guiding variant interpretation strategies and experimental characterisation. Predictions for the human UniProt reference proteome are available at https://osf.io/z4dcp/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.