Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39172965›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2024

Examining and Supporting Mechanistic Explanations Across Chemistry and Biology Courses.

Megan Shiroda, Clare G-C Franovic, Joelyn de Lima, Keenan Noyes, Devin Babi, Estefany Beltran-Flores, Jenna Kesh, Robert L McKay, Elijah Persson-Gordon, Melanie M Cooper and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Megan ShirodaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, 603 Wilson Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Clare G-C FranovicDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, 578 South Shaw Lane, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Joelyn de LimaDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, 612 Wilson Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Keenan NoyesDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, 578 South Shaw Lane, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Devin BabiDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, 612 Wilson Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Estefany Beltran-FloresDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, 612 Wilson Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Jenna KeshDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, 603 Wilson Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Robert L McKayDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, 578 South Shaw Lane, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Elijah Persson-GordonDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, 612 Wilson Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Melanie M CooperDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, 578 South Shaw Lane, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Tammy M LongEPFL, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christina V SchwarzDepartment of Teacher Education, Michigan State University, 620 Farm Lane, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Jon R StoltzfusDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, 603 Wilson Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causal mechanistic reasoning is a thinking strategy that can help students explain complex phenomena using core ideas commonly emphasized in separate undergraduate courses, as it requires students to identify underlying entities, unpack their relevant properties and interactions, and link them to construct mechanistic explanations. As a crossdisciplinary group of biologists, chemists, and teacher educators, we designed a scaffolded set of tasks that require content knowledge from biology and chemistry to construct nested hierarchical mechanistic explanations that span three scales (molecular, macromolecular, and cellular). We examined student explanations across seven introductory and upper-level biology and chemistry courses to determine how the construction of mechanistic explanations varied across courses and the relationship between the construction of mechanistic explanations at different scales. We found non-, partial, and complete mechanistic explanations in all courses and at each scale. Complete mechanistic explanation construction was lowest in introductory chemistry, about the same across biology and organic chemistry, and highest in biochemistry. Across tasks, the construction of a mechanistic explanation at a smaller scale was associated with constructing a mechanistic explanation for larger scales; however, the use of molecular scale disciplinary resources was only associated with complete mechanistic explanations at the macromolecular, not cellular scale.

Indexed as

BiologyChemistryCurriculumStudentsHumansThinking

Identifiers

PMID39172965
PMCPMC11440742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.