ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Intersectional inequity in knowledge, attitude, and testing related to HIV in Ethiopia: People with multiple disadvantages are left behind.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resident based disparities in HIV testing among the general population in Ethiopia: Evidence from the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Discriminatory attitudes toward people living with HIV/AIDS in East Africa: a multilevel analysis of socioeconomic and behavioral determinants using DHS 2019-2023 data.AIDS research and therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Increasing childhood illnesses (diarrhea and fever) and decreasing care-seeking practices in Nepal: Insights from three most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (2011, 2016 and 2022).PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intersectionality pinpoints intersecting factors that empower or oppress people with multiple (dis)advantageous conditions. This study examined intersectional inequity in knowledge, attitudes, and testing related to HIV among adults aged 15 to 49 years in Ethiopia. This study used nationally representative 2016 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey data. The sample size was 27,261 for knowledge about HIV/AIDS and 25,542 for attitude towards people living with HIV and HIV testing. Triple (dis)advantage groups were based on wealth status, education status, and residence. The triple advantages variables specifically are urban residents, the educated, and those who belong to households of high wealth status, while the triple disadvantages are rural residents, the uneducated, and those who live in poor household wealth rank. A multilevel logistic regression analysis was employed. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and confidence intervals (CI) with a P-value ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Based on descriptive analysis, 27.9% (95% CI: 26.5%, 29.3%) of adults had comprehensive knowledge about HIV/AIDS, 39.8% (95% CI: 37.6, 41.9%) exhibited accepting attitude towards people living with HIV, and 20.4% (95% CI: 19.1%, 21.8%) undergo HIV testing. Comprehensive knowledge about HIV/AIDS, accepting attitude towards people living with HIV, and HIV testing was 47.0%, 75.7%, and 36.1% among those with triple advantages, and 13.9%, 16.0% and 8.7% among those with triple non-advantages, respectively. The odds of having comprehensive knowledge about HIV/AIDS, accepting attitude towards people living with HIV, and HIV testing were about three (aOR = 3.4; 95% CI: 2.76 to 4.21), seven (aOR = 7.3; 95% CI = 5.79 to 9.24) and five (aOR = 4.7; 95% CI:3.60 to 6.10) times higher for triple forms of advantage than triple disadvantages, respectively. The findings of this study imply that Ethiopia will not achieve the proposed targets for HIV/AIDS services unless it prioritises individuals who live under multiple disadvantaged conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.