Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39172796›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Mapping the existing body of knowledge on new and repurposed TB vaccine implementation: A scoping review.

Joeri S Buis, Degu Jerene, Agnes Gebhard, Roel Bakker, Arman Majidulla, Andrew D Kerkhoff, Rupali J Limaye, Puck T Pelzer

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joeri S BuisKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1836-1807
Degu JereneKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7853-4211
Agnes GebhardKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Roel BakkerKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1958-0944
Arman MajidullaDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Andrew D KerkhoffDivision of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5023-6658
Rupali J LimayeDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-9720
Puck T PelzerKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1648-0304

Funding

Feasibility and acceptability of a peer-led strategy to improve community tuberculosis case finding among non-household contacts in ZambiaK23AI157914 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KERKHOFF, ANDREW · 2021 to 2025
$999k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI157914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is global consensus on the urgent need for a safe and effective TB vaccine for adults and adolescents to improve global TB control, and encouragingly, several promising candidates have advanced to late-stage trials. Significant gaps remain in understanding the critical factors that will facilitate the successful implementation of new and repurposed TB vaccines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), once available. By synthesizing the existing body of knowledge, this review offers comprehensive insights into the current state of research on implementation of these adult and adolescent vaccines. This review explores four key dimensions: (1) epidemiological impact, (2) costing, cost-effectiveness, and/or economic impact, (3) acceptability, and the (4) feasibility of implementation; this includes implementation strategies of target populations, and health system capabilities. Results indicate that current research primarily consists of epidemiological and costing/cost-effectiveness/economic studies in India, China, and South Africa, mainly modelling with M72/AS01, BCG revaccination, and hypothetical vaccines. Varying endpoints, vaccine efficacies, and vaccination coverages were used. Globally, new, and repurposed TB vaccines are estimated to save millions of lives. Economically, these vaccines also demonstrate promise with expected cost-effectiveness in most countries. Projected outcomes were dependent on vaccine characteristics, target population, implementation strategy, timing of roll out, TB burden/country context, and vaccination coverage. Potential barriers for vaccine acceptability included TB-related stigma, need for a second dose, and cost, while low pricing, community and civil society engagement and heightened public TB awareness were potential enablers in China, India, and South Africa. Potential implementation strategies considered spanned from mass campaigns to integration within existing vaccine programs and the primary target group studied was the general population, and adults and adolescents. In conclusion, future research must have broader geographical representations to better understand what is needed to inform tailored vaccine programs to accommodate diverse country contexts and population groups to achieve optimal implementation and impact. Furthermore, this review underscores the scarcity of research on acceptability of new and repurposed TB vaccines and their delivery among potential beneficiaries, the most promising implementation strategies, and the health system capabilities necessary for implementation. The absence of this knowledge in these areas emphasizes the crucial need for future research to ensure effective TB vaccine implementation in high burden settings worldwide.

Identifiers

PMID39172796
PMCPMC11340902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.