Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39172777›Full record

ReviewCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

A Narrative Review of the Current Research in Cancer-Related Pain Inequities: The Necessity of Applying Intersectionality to Advance Cancer Pain Research.

Katarina E AuBuchon, Myla Lyons, Erika Braun, Hunter Groninger, Kristi Graves, Lisa Bowleg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk factors associated with the co-occurrence of severe pain and sleep disturbance in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katarina E AuBuchonLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8611-8290
Myla LyonsPsychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Erika BraunPsychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Hunter GroningerDepartment of Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Kristi GravesLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Lisa BowlegPsychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

Training Program in Cancer Population Science (CaPS)T32CA261787 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Lucile L. Adams-Campbell, Suzanne C. O'Neill · 2021 to 2026
$1.1M
Training Program in Approaches to Address Social-Structural Factors Related to HIV Intersectionally (TASHI)T32MH130247 · NIMH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ingrid Alisa Bowleg, Deanna L Kerrigan · 2022 to 2026
$965k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA261787NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH130247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer-related pain has a significant impact on quality of life for patients with cancer. In populations without cancer, there are documented pain inequities associated with minoritized racial and/or ethnic groups, women, and low socioeconomic status. However, our understanding of pain inequities specifically among patients with cancer remains incomplete. We narratively synthesized published quantitative research on cancer-related pain inequities in the US in the past decade. A search identified 17 English-language articles examining pain for patients with various cancer types at different treatment stages. Our review revealed mixed findings comparing cancer-related pain by racial group (e.g., Black vs White) and sex (male vs female), but consistent findings indicating that people with lower (vs higher) socioeconomic status and younger (vs older) patients report more cancer-related pain. Research on cancer pain among sexual and gender minorities remains scant. Key research gaps include a need for more research that incorporates an intersectional perspective by exploring intersecting subgroups and measuring social and structural processes that drive pain inequities. These findings underscore an important need for researchers to use an intersectional approach to cancer pain to help elucidate key populations at-risk for exacerbated cancer-related pain and identify ways to mitigate social and structural processes that drive these inequities.

Indexed as

Cancer PainFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth InequitiesHumansMaleNeoplasmsQuality of Lifecancer inequitycancer painhealth disparityintersectionalitypain disparity

Identifiers

PMID39172777
PMCPMC11342440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.