ArticleBlood2024
Genotyped RhD+ red cells for D-positive patients with sickle cell disease with conventional RHD and unexpected anti-D.
Article in Blood, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04156906 (RH Genotype Matched Red Cells for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and Anti-D), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
RH Genotype Matched Red Cells for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and Anti-D
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Red cell antigen exposures in patients with sickle cell disease receiving transfusion from Black and Hispanic donors.Blood red cells & iron · 2026Article
- Molecular Testing in Sickle Cell Disease: From Newborn Screening to Transfusion Care.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- Bridging the Gap: High-ResolutionHuman mutation · 2026Article
- Strategies to mitigate transfusion-associated red blood cell alloimmunization in sickle cell disease: A retrospective analysis.Transfusion · 2025Article
- Array genotyping of transfusion-relevant blood cell antigens in 6946 ancestrally diverse study participants.Blood · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractAnti-D can occur in D-positive patients who inherit RHD genetic variants encoding partial D antigen expression, but unexpected anti-D is also found in the plasma of patients with sickle cell disease who have conventional RHD gene(s) and are transfused with units from Black donors. These anti-D are likely stimulated by variant Rh expressed on donor cells; however, patients with anti-D, regardless of cause, are transfused for a lifetime with D-negative (Rh-negative) blood. This results in significant increased use of Rh-negative units, especially for those requiring chronic transfusion, which can strain Rh-negative blood inventories. We tested whether D-positive patients who made anti-D and had conventional RhD by RHD genotyping could safely be returned to D-positive transfusions without anti-D reappearance or compromised red blood cell survival using RHD genotype-matched units from Black donors. Five patients receiving chronic red cell exchange received an increasing number of D-positive units per procedure with a total of 72 D-positive RHD genotyped units transfused, with no anti-D restimulation. Unexpected anti-C and anti-E were identified during the study associated with donors with variant RHCE alleles. RH genotyping of D-positive units for transfusion may improve use and allocation of valuable Black donor units and reduce demand for Rh-negative blood. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04156906.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.