Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39172632›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2025

Microbiome and Metabolome Restoration After Administration of Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm (REBYOTA) for Preventing Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Ken F Blount, Romeo Papazyan, Nicky Ferdyan, Karthik Srinivasan, Carlos Gonzalez, William D Shannon, Bryan C Fuchs

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03244644 (A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RBX2660), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03244644 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RBX2660 (Microbiota Suspension) for the Prevention of Clostridium Difficile Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorRebiotix Inc.Ran2017 to 2020Enrolled320ConditionsClostridium Difficile Infection (CDI)ArmsRBX2660, Placebo, Open label RBX2660 (only for confirmed CDI recurrence)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Evaluation of fecal microbiota, live (RBL) for the prevention of recurrentJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Newer Therapeutics to Selectively KillInfectious disease reports · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The evolving landscape of live biotherapeutics in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ken F BlountFerring Pharmaceuticals, Roseville, Minnesota.
Romeo PapazyanFerring Research Institute, San Diego, California.
Nicky FerdyanFerring Research Institute, San Diego, California.
Karthik SrinivasanFerring Research Institute, San Diego, California.
Carlos GonzalezBioRankings, St Louis, Missouri.
William D ShannonBioRankings, St Louis, Missouri.
Bryan C FuchsFerring Research Institute, San Diego, California.

Funding

Rebiotix, Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobiota-based treatments are effective in preventing recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (REBYOTA; RBL, previously RBX2660) was shown to prevent recurrent C difficile infection in a phase 3 clinical trial (PUNCH CD3) based on a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled design.

methodsStool samples from participants in PUNCH CD3 who received a single blinded dose of rectally administered RBL or placebo were sequenced to determine microbial community composition and calculate the Microbiome Health Index for postantibiotic dysbiosis. The composition of bile acids (BAs) in the same samples was quantified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Relationships between BA composition and microbiota community structure and correlations with treatment outcomes were assessed.

resultsBefore administration, Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli dominated the microbiota community, and primary BAs were more prevalent than secondary BAs. Clinical success after administration correlated with shifts to predominantly Bacteroidia and Clostridia, a significant increase in Microbiome Health Index for postantibiotic dysbiosis, and a shift from primary to secondary BAs. Several microbiota and BA changes were more extensive in RBL-treated responders as compared with placebo-treated responders, and microbiota changes correlated with BA changes.

conclusionsClinical response and RBL administration were associated with significant restoration of microbiota and BA composition. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03244644 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03244644).

Indexed as

Clostridium InfectionsFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetabolomeProbioticsAdultAgedBile Acids and SaltsClostridioides difficileDouble-Blind MethodDysbiosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBile Acids and Saltsclinical trialsClostridioides difficile infectionmetabolomemicrobiota-based therapyrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39172632
PMCPMC12247815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.