Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39172627›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2025

Efficacy and Safety of Pimodivir Combined With Standard of Care in Hospitalized and Nonhospitalized High-Risk Adolescents and Adults With Influenza A Infection.

Lorant Leopold, Johan Vingerhoets, Sofie Deleu, Catherine Nalpas, Karin Weber, Ilse van Dromme, David Lowson, Bart Michiels, Wilbert van Duijnhoven

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03376321 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pimodivir in Combination With the Standard-of-Care Treatment in Adolescent, Adult, and Elderly Hospitalized Patients With Influenza A Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2018 to 2020Enrolled334ConditionsInfluenza AArmsPimodivir 600 mg, Placebo, SOC Treatment
NCT03381196 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pimodivir in Combination With the Standard-of-care Treatment in Adolescent, Adult, and Elderly Non-hospitalized Subjects With Influenza A Infection Who Are at Risk of Developing Complications

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2018 to 2020Enrolled553ConditionsInfluenza AArmsPimodivir 600 mg, Placebo, SOC Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lorant LeopoldJanssen Research & Development, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6410-3696
Johan VingerhoetsJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Sofie DeleuJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Catherine NalpasJanssen Research & Development, Paris, France.
Karin WeberJanssen Global Medical Affairs, IDV, Vienna, Austria.
Ilse van DrommeJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
David LowsonJanssen Research & Development, High Wycombe, UK.
Bart MichielsJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Wilbert van DuijnhovenJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.

Funding

Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority HHS0100201500014CJanssen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn unmet need exists for effective antivirals to treat patients hospitalized with influenza. The results of 2 phase 3 studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pimodivir in combination with investigator-chosen standard of care (SoC) treatment are presented.

methodsHospitalized patients (hospital study; NCT03376321) and high-risk outpatients (outpatient study; NCT03381196) with laboratory-confirmed influenza A infection were randomized 1:1 to 600 mg pimodivir twice daily + SoC or placebo twice daily + SoC for 5 days. For most patients, SoC included oseltamivir. Primary end points were Hospital Recovery Scale (HRS) at day 6 (hospital study) and median time to resolution (TTR) of influenza-related symptoms (outpatient study).

resultsPimodivir + SoC (oseltamivir) treatment showed no clinical benefit over placebo + SoC on HRS at day 6 (common odds ratio, 0.943; 95% confidence interval [CI], .609-1.462; P = .397; hospital study). A shorter median TTR of 7 symptoms was estimated with pimodivir + SoC versus placebo (92.6 hours; 95% CI, 77.6-104.2 vs 105.1 hours; 95% CI, 92.7-128.6; P = .0216; outpatient study).

conclusionsPimodivir + SoC showed no additional clinical benefit versus SoC treatment alone in hospitalized patients. Pimodivir + SoC demonstrated shorter TTR of influenza symptoms versus placebo + SoC in high-risk outpatients. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT03376321 and NCT03381196.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsInfluenza, HumanAdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfluenza A virusMaleMiddle AgedOseltamivirStandard of CareTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsOseltamivirhospitalized patientsHospital Recovery Scaleinfluenza Aordinal endpointrespiratory viral infection

Identifiers

PMID39172627
PMCPMC11793051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.