Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39172481›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

A Novel, Low-Cost Alternative to Traditional Glaucoma Surgeries.

Cheng F Kong, John Yek, Philippa Clegg, Kathleen Graham, Rohan Gupta, Philip Boughton, Mark Billson, Andrew White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cheng F KongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
John YekDepartment of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Philippa CleggGlobal Surgical Innovations, Sydney, Australia.
Kathleen GrahamNorth Richmond Veterinary Hospital, Richmond, Australia.
Rohan GuptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Philip BoughtonGlobal Surgical Innovations, Sydney, Australia.
Mark BillsonSmall Animal Specialist Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Andrew WhiteDepartment of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the real-world efficacy of a novel, low-cost glaucoma drainage device in canine and human patients. Methods: A retrospective case series of 17 eyes in 14 canines and one eye of a human patient who each underwent novel drainage device implantation is described. This device was constructed by insertion and advancement of a 24-gauge cannula (canine) or 23-gauge cannula (human) perpendicularly through five adjacent tubes of a 25-mm Yeates surgical drain. Results: Of the canine patients, the average follow-up period was 362 days (range, 27-863). The mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was 50.9 ± 17.9 mm Hg. Following tube surgery, IOP was maintained at <20 mm Hg in 81.3%, 100%, 100%, 85.7%, 100%, and 75.0% of eyes at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Bleb needling and/or revisions were required in five eyes. Enucleations and/or device explantations were performed in five eyes at mean day 140. In the human case, the device was implanted in the right eye of a 64-year-old male with refractory raised IOP (55 mm Hg) despite maximum medical therapy. IOP was well controlled until day 818, when eventual tissue breakdown necessitated device removal. Conclusions: This design represents a novel, low-cost, effective alternative to traditional glaucoma tube devices. Translational Relevance: This device has great potential for use in regions where the needs for glaucoma drainage devices and surgical alternatives to trabeculectomy have not been met. Further development may include tube crimping or fenestration and preoperative loading of slow-release antibiotics and/or anti-metabolite medications within the non-draining lumens.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsIntraocular PressureAgedAnimalsDogsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis ImplantationRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39172481
PMCPMC11346128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.