Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39172436›Full record

ArticleACS nano2024

Brain Nucleic Acid Delivery and Genome Editing via Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening and Long-Circulating Nanoparticles.

Gijung Kwak, Angad Grewal, Hasan Slika, Griffin Mess, Haolin Li, Mohit Kwatra, Alexandros Poulopoulos, Graeme F Woodworth, Charles G Eberhart, Han Seok Ko and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The RNA delivery dilemma-lipid versus polymer nanoparticle platforms.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Tissue-specific gene delivery approaches.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Smart Nanotechnologies for Multimodal Neuromodulation and Brain Interfacing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gijung KwakDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6908-9638
Angad GrewalDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Hasan SlikaDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Griffin MessDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Haolin LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-1613-5110
Mohit KwatraInstitute for Cell Engineering, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Alexandros PoulopoulosDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States.
Graeme F WoodworthDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States.
Charles G EberhartDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States.
Han Seok KoInstitute for Cell Engineering, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0864-5239
Amir ManbachiDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Justin CaplanDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Richard J PriceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, United States.
Betty TylerDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Jung Soo SukDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2437-0001

Funding

Innovative systemic gene therapy for treating Parkinson's diseaseR01NS111102 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI PRICE, RICHARD J., SUK, JUNG SOO · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
Nanocage-based systemic delivery of TGFβ trap for immunomodulation of brain neoplasmsR01NS119609 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LIM, MICHAEL, SUK, JUNG SOO · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
Acquisition of a 500 MHz NMR Spectrometer to Support Small-Molecule Chemistry at Johns Hopkins Medical SchoolS10OD034217 · OD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BHAT, SHRIDHAR · 2024 to 2024
$425k
NIH HHS S10 OD034217NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111102NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS119609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a two-pronged strategy comprising focused ultrasound (FUS)-mediated blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening and long-circulating biodegradable nanoparticles (NPs) for systemic delivery of nucleic acids to the brain. Biodegradable poly(β-amino ester) polymer-based NPs were engineered to stably package various types of nucleic acid payloads and enable prolonged systemic circulation while retaining excellent serum stability. FUS was applied to a predetermined coordinate within the brain to transiently open the BBB, thereby allowing the systemically administered long-circulating NPs to traverse the BBB and accumulate in the FUS-treated brain region, where plasmid DNA or mRNA payloads produced reporter proteins in astrocytes and neurons. In contrast, poorly circulating and/or serum-unstable NPs, including the lipid NP analogous to a platform used in clinic, were unable to provide efficient nucleic acid delivery to the brain regardless of the BBB-opening FUS. The marriage of FUS-mediated BBB opening and the long-circulating NPs engineered to copackage mRNA encoding CRISPR-associated protein 9 and single-guide RNA resulted in genome editing in astrocytes and neurons precisely in the FUS-treated brain region. The combined delivery strategy provides a versatile means to achieve efficient and site-specific therapeutic nucleic acid delivery to and genome editing in the brain via a systemic route.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierGene EditingNanoparticlesAnimalsAstrocytesBrainDNAGene Transfer TechniquesHumansMiceNeuronsNucleic AcidsPlasmidsPolymersRNA, MessengerUltrasonic WavesDNANucleic Acidspoly(beta-amino ester)PolymersRNA, Messengerbiodegradable polymerblood–brain barrierbrain gene therapylong-circulating nanoparticlesystemic nucleic acid delivery

Identifiers

PMID39172436
PMCPMC11792178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.