Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39172297›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2024

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Italy.

Gianni Ghetti, Francesco Saverio Mennini, Andrea Marcellusi, Matthias Bischof, Gabriele Maria Pistillo, Marika Pane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gianni GhettiAdRes HEOR s.r.l., Via Vittorio Alfieri, 17, 10121, Turin, Italy. g.ghetti@adreshe.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6809-5251
Francesco Saverio MenniniCEIS-Economic Evaluation and HTA (EEHTA), Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Andrea MarcellusiCEIS-Economic Evaluation and HTA (EEHTA), Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Matthias BischofNovartis Gene Therapies GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Gabriele Maria PistilloNovartis Gene Therapies, Milan, Italy.
Marika PanePediatric Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli," IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveUntreated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is the leading genetic cause of death in children younger than 2 years of age. Early detection through newborn screening allows for presymptomatic diagnosis and treatment of SMA. With effective treatments available and reimbursed by the National Health Service, many regions in Italy are implementing newborn screening for SMA. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of universal newborn screening for SMA in Italy.

methodsA decision-analytic model assessed the cost effectiveness of newborn screening from the National Health Service perspective in 400,000 newborns. Newborn screening enabling early identification and presymptomatic treatment of SMA was compared with no newborn screening, symptomatic diagnosis, and treatment. Transition probabilities between health states were estimated from clinical trial data. Higher-functioning health states were associated with increased survival, higher utility values, and lower costs. Long-term survival and utilities were extrapolated from scientific literature. Health care costs were collected from official Italian sources. A lifetime time horizon was applied, and costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

resultsNewborn screening followed by presymptomatic treatment yielded 324 incremental life-years, 390 incremental quality-adjusted life-years, and reduced costs by €1,513,375 over a lifetime time horizon compared with no newborn screening. Thus, newborn screening was less costly and more effective than no newborn screening. Newborn screening has a 100% probability of being cost effective, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of > €40,000.

conclusionsNewborn screening followed by presymptomatic SMA treatment is cost effective from the Italian National Health Service perspective.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisMuscular Atrophy, SpinalNeonatal ScreeningQuality-Adjusted Life YearsCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDecision Support TechniquesHealth Care CostsHumansInfant, NewbornItaly

Identifiers

PMID39172297
PMCPMC11455709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.