ArticleClinical drug investigation2024
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Italy.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Spain, Greece, and Portugal.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Expanding 5q-SMA Newborn Screening in Latin America: A Brazilian Model for National and Regional Implementation.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness and Public Health Impact of Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in France.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of treatments for presymptomatic newborn patients with spinal muscular atrophy and two or three copies of the survival motor neuron 2 gene in Italy.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Neonatal screening for spinal muscular atrophy: Report of a multicenter study in Brazil.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Economic Evaluation of Patiromer in Patients with Concomitant Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease in Italy.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Australian Hospitals.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy: An Evolving Scenario through New Perspectives in Diagnosis and Advances in Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveUntreated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is the leading genetic cause of death in children younger than 2 years of age. Early detection through newborn screening allows for presymptomatic diagnosis and treatment of SMA. With effective treatments available and reimbursed by the National Health Service, many regions in Italy are implementing newborn screening for SMA. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of universal newborn screening for SMA in Italy.
methodsA decision-analytic model assessed the cost effectiveness of newborn screening from the National Health Service perspective in 400,000 newborns. Newborn screening enabling early identification and presymptomatic treatment of SMA was compared with no newborn screening, symptomatic diagnosis, and treatment. Transition probabilities between health states were estimated from clinical trial data. Higher-functioning health states were associated with increased survival, higher utility values, and lower costs. Long-term survival and utilities were extrapolated from scientific literature. Health care costs were collected from official Italian sources. A lifetime time horizon was applied, and costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.
resultsNewborn screening followed by presymptomatic treatment yielded 324 incremental life-years, 390 incremental quality-adjusted life-years, and reduced costs by €1,513,375 over a lifetime time horizon compared with no newborn screening. Thus, newborn screening was less costly and more effective than no newborn screening. Newborn screening has a 100% probability of being cost effective, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of > €40,000.
conclusionsNewborn screening followed by presymptomatic SMA treatment is cost effective from the Italian National Health Service perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.