Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39172278›Full record

SynthesisTropical animal health and production2024

Examining performance, milk, and meat in ruminants fed with macroalgae and microalgae: A meta-analysis perspective.

Muhammad Ainsyar Harahap, Slamet Widodo, Ulvi Fitri Handayani, Ririen Indriawaty Altandjung, Wulandari, Awistaros Angger Sakti, Bayu Andri Atmoko, Windu Negara, Yelsi Listiana Dewi, Hardi Julendra and 7 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tropical animal health and production, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Inclusion of Sub-Antarctic Macroalgae (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Potential of seaweed (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Muhammad Ainsyar HarahapResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6579-409X
Slamet WidodoResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2325-0745
Ulvi Fitri HandayaniResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9443-2901
Ririen Indriawaty AltandjungResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3016-1714
WulandariResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0817-1942
Awistaros Angger SaktiResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9841-4575
Bayu Andri AtmokoResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2311-2529
Windu NegaraResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-9385
Yelsi Listiana DewiResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1220-0961
Hardi JulendraResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8395-6010
Ahmad SofyanResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0578-4671
Tegoh WahyonoResearch Center for Food Technology and Processing, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gunungkidul, 55861, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5433-5952
Tri UjilestariResearch Center for Food Technology and Processing, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gunungkidul, 55861, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2244-9354
Bilal AhmedUndergraduate Student from Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9548-2922
Novia QomariyahResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6545-1326
Mohammad Miftakhus SholikinResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8677-6982
Zein Ahmad BaihaqiResearch Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia. zein001@brin.go.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6192-7537

Funding

LPDP-BRIN 12/II.7/HK/2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis consolidates various related studies to identify patterns in the impact of feeding algae on performance aspects, including milk fat, milk protein, and carcass yield in several ruminant species, such as cattle, sheep, and goats. The data were collected from 67 articles that examined factors such as the type of algae (macro- and microalgae), algal species, and animal breed. Barki sheep, Moghani sheep, and Zaraibi goats demonstrated an increased average daily gain (P < 0.05) when fed with both macro- and microalgae. Conversely, sheep such as Canadian Arcott and Ile-de-France showed adverse effects on the feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P < 0.05). Elevated FCR values were observed across castrated and young animals (P < 0.05). Algae extract notably increased the hot carcass weight (P < 0.001), particularly among Moghani sheep (P < 0.001). Raw algae significantly reduced the milk fat content (P < 0.001), particularly in cattle and sheep (P < 0.001). A decrease in milk fat was particularly noticeable in lactating females of Assaf sheep, Damascus goats, and Holstein cows (P < 0.001). Overall, algae inclusion tended to decrease the milk protein content (P < 0.05), leading to reduced milk production (P < 0.001) with cumulative algae feeding in Assaf sheep. However, conjugated linoleic acid (CLA; C18:2 c9,t11-CLA and C18:2 c12,t10-CLA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; C22:6n-3) mostly increased in meat and milk from Holstein cow, Assaf sheep, Dorset sheep, and Ile-de-France sheep (P < 0.01). This meta-analysis highlights the necessity for additional research aimed at optimizing the sustainable use of algae in feed for ruminants, despite the demonstrated improvements in performance and the levels of CLA and DHA found in meat and milk.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietMeatMicroalgaeMilkSeaweedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleFemaleGoatsSheepCarcass qualityConjugated linoleic acidDocosahexaenoic acidMacro- and microalgaeMilk quality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.