Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39172192›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Social media for radiologists: opportunities and challenges.

Marcela Caetano Vilela Lauar, Gabriela Caetano Vilela Lauar, Cinthia Callegari Barbisan, Aline Campos Oliveira Mello, Carla Cristina Teixeira Polimeni Benetti, Kamila Seidel Albuquerque, Luciana Pardini Chamié

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcela Caetano Vilela LauarBeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriela Caetano Vilela LauarBeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cinthia Callegari BarbisanBeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Aline Campos Oliveira MelloBeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carla Cristina Teixeira Polimeni BenettiBeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Kamila Seidel AlbuquerqueBeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciana Pardini ChamiéChamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil. luciana@chamie.com.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of social media in medicine offers unprecedented opportunities for social interaction. Activity on platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn plays crucial roles in various medical services, particularly regarding patients' access to information and healthcare services, medical education, and professional networking. However, the integration of social media into healthcare is not challenge-free and has certain pitfalls. In this article, we address several critical issues that compromise the reliability and effectiveness of social media as a professional healthcare resource, particularly in the field of radiology. We discuss possible solutions and tips and tricks to facilitate the use of this valuable tool to our advantage and in a reliable manner.

Indexed as

RadiologistsSocial MediaHumansRadiologyCareer benefitsEthicsMisinformationRadiologistsSocial media

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.