ArticleHeart and vessels2025
Fractal geometry of culprit coronary plaque images within optical coherence tomography in patients with acute coronary syndrome vs stable angina pectoris.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The main cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is plaque rupture and thrombus formation. However, it has not been fairly successful to identify vulnerable plaque to rupture using conventional parameters of intravascular imaging modalities. Fractal analysis is one of the mathematical models to examine geometrical features of picture image using a specific parameter called as fractal dimension (FD) which suggests geometric complexity of the image. This study examined FD of the optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived images of the culprit plaque in patients with ACS vs stable angina pectoris (SAP) to evaluate the feasibility of FD for identifying vulnerable coronary plaques prone to provoke ACS distinguished from stable plaques only provoking SAP. We examined 65 cases (34 ACS patients, 31 SAP patients) in which the culprit lesion was imaged by OCT before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ACS and SAP. The culprit plaque lesion in the ACS group had a significantly larger mean lipid arc (203.8 ± 39.4° vs 152.3 ± 34.5°, p < 0.001) and a larger lipid plaque length (12.6 ± 5.1 mm vs 7.7 ± 2.7 mm, p < 0.001) and a thinner fibrous cap thickness (75.3 ± 22.3 μm vs 134.8 ± 53.2 μm, p < 0.001) than those in the SAP group. The prevalence of OCT-derived macrophage infiltration (Mph) in the entire culprit coronary vessel as well as that of the OCT-derived thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) at the culprit lesion were significantly greater in the ACS group than those in the SAP group, respectively (Mph: 61.8% vs 35.5%, p = 0.048; TCFA: 44.1% vs 6.4%, p < 0.001). The FD of culprit plaque in the ACS group was significantly greater than in the SAP group (2.401 ± 0.073 vs 2.341 ± 0.051, p < 0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, the presence of Mph was a significant determinant of FD (regression coefficient estimate 0.049, CI 0.018-0.079, p = 0.002). The FD of OCT-derived image of culprit coronary plaque in the ACS group was significantly greater than that in the SAP group, indicating that the culprit plaque in ACS were structurally more complex. Therefore, fractal analysis of coronary OCT images might be clinically useful for identifying coronary plaques prone to provoke ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39172189What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.