ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Simultaneous
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced neuroimaging in pediatric epilepsy surgery: state of the art and future perspectives.Neuroradiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the (1) successful surgery proportion in patients with clear structural lesions on MRI and single abnormality on
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 123 patients diagnosed with refractory epilepsy who underwent presurgical evaluation involving
resultsDefinitely single lesion abnormality was observed in 35.0% (43/123) of the patients on the MRI portion of PET/MRI. The proportion increased to 74.0% (91/123) when 18 F-FDG PET portion was added. About 75% (69/91) of patients displaying a clear-cut lesion on 18 F-FDG PET/MRI were classified as Engel Class I one-year post-surgery. The proportion of Engel Class I patients was not significantly different when comparing MRI-single lesion patients with MRI-negative, PET-single lesion patients one year after surgery (81.4% vs. 70.0%, P = 0.24). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the detection of a clear single lesion on 18 F-FDG PET/MRI was a strong positive predictor of a favorable surgical outcome (OR 3.518, 95% CI 1.363-9.077, p = 0.009).
conclusionSingle lesion detected on 18 F-FDG PET/MRI is useful to predict good surgical outcome for refractory epilepsy patients; Those patients should be considered as candidates for surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39172166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.