Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39172164›Full record

ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2024

[Correction of aphakia in cases of insufficient capsular bag stability].

Isabella D Baur, Isabel Winkelmann, Michael Albrecht, Youssef Botros, Gerd U Auffarth, Ramin Khoramnia

Erratum issuedAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Polypseudophakia: from "Piggyback" to supplementary sulcus-fixated IOLs.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2025
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabella D BaurAugenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.
Isabel WinkelmannAugenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.
Michael AlbrechtAugenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Youssef BotrosAugenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.
Gerd U AuffarthAugenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Ramin KhoramniaAugenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Ramin.Khoramnia@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6237-7773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of situations can lead to the need for an alternative method of intraocular lens (IOL) fixation if implantation in the capsular bag is not possible. Depending on the situation, sulcus-fixated IOLs, iris-fixated IOLs (IFIOLs) and scleral-fixated IOLs (SFIOLs) are available. With SFIOLs, a distinction is made between suture-fixated and sutureless-fixated techniques. This paper summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches, including the newer methods of sutureless SFIOLs. The decision on a specific approach in the individual case depends on both the individual circumstances of the patient and the experience of the surgeon.

Indexed as

Lens Implantation, IntraocularAphakiaAphakia, PostcataractHumansIrisLens Capsule, CrystallineLenses, IntraocularScleraSuture TechniquesComplication managementIOL exchangeIris-fixated IOLsSleral-fixated IOLsSulcus-fixated IOLs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.