ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Generation of a high confidence set of domain-domain interface types to guide protein complex structure predictions by AlphaFold.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimeric protein interaction and complex prediction: Structure, dynamics and function.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationWhile the release of AlphaFold (AF) represented a breakthrough for the prediction of protein complex structures, its sensitivity, especially when using full length protein sequences, still remains limited. Modeling success rates might increase if AF predictions were guided by likely interacting protein fragments. This approach requires available sets of highly confident protein-protein interface types. Computational resources, such as 3did, infer interacting globular domain types from observed contacts in protein structures. Assessing the accuracy of these predicted interface types is difficult because we lack hand-curated reference sets of verified domain-domain interface (DDI) types.
resultsTo improve protein complex modeling of DDIs by AF, we manually inspected 80 randomly selected DDI types from the 3did resource to generate a first reference set of DDI types. Identified cases of DDI type nonapproval (40%) primarily resulted from inaccurate Pfam domain matches, crystal contacts, and synthetic protein constructs. Using logistic regression, we predicted a subset of 2411 out of 5724 considered DDI types in 3did to be of high confidence, which we subsequently applied to 53 000 human-protein interactions to predict DDIs followed by AF modeling. We obtained highly confident AF models for 604 out of 1129 predicted DDIs. Of note, for 47% of them no confident AF structural model could be obtained using full length protein sequences. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code is available at https://github.com/KatjaLuckLab/DDI_manuscript.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.