Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39171726›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2024

Photosynthesis and photoprotection in top leaves respond faster to irradiance fluctuations than bottom leaves in a tomato canopy.

Bingjie Shao, Yuqi Zhang, Elena Vincenzi, Sarah Berman, Silvere Vialet-Chabrand, Leo F M Marcelis, Tao Li, Elias Kaiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Shining light on photosynthesis.Journal of experimental botany · 2025
    Article
  10. Distribution of glucosinolates and antioxidants in different leaf-layers of Kale (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bingjie ShaoInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0006-9849-2833
Yuqi ZhangInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1431-7407
Elena VincenziHorticulture and Product Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2920-4723
Sarah BermanHorticulture and Product Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7675-3274
Silvere Vialet-ChabrandHorticulture and Product Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2105-2825
Leo F M MarcelisHorticulture and Product Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8088-7232
Tao LiInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6755-7183
Elias KaiserHorticulture and Product Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9081-9604

Funding

Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund BSRF202201National Natural Science Foundation of China 32172654Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program 2022QNRC001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accounting for the dynamic responses of photosynthesis and photoprotection to naturally fluctuating irradiance can improve predictions of plant performance in the field, but the variation of these dynamics within crop canopies is poorly understood. We conducted a detailed study of dynamic and steady-state photosynthesis, photoprotection, leaf pigmentation, and stomatal anatomy in four leaf layers (100, 150, 200, and 250 cm from the floor) of a fully grown tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Foundation) canopy in a greenhouse. We found that leaves at the top of the canopy exhibited higher photosynthetic capacity and slightly faster photosynthetic induction compared with lower-canopy leaves, accompanied by higher stomatal conductance and a faster activation of carboxylation and linear electron transport capacities. In upper-canopy leaves, non-photochemical quenching showed faster induction and relaxation after increases and decreases in irradiance, allowing for more effective photoprotection in these leaves. Despite these observed differences in transient responses between leaf layers, steady-state rather than dynamic photosynthesis traits were more influential for predicting photosynthesis under fluctuating irradiance. Also, a model analysis revealed that time-averaged photosynthesis under fluctuating irradiance could be accurately predicted by one set of Rubisco activation/deactivation parameters across all four leaf layers, thereby greatly simplifying future modelling efforts of whole-canopy photosynthesis.

Indexed as

PhotosynthesisPlant LeavesSolanum lycopersicumLightPlant StomataRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseCanopy photosynthesisdynamic photosynthesisnon-photochemical quenchingphotosynthetic inductionstomatal conductancetomato

Identifiers

PMID39171726
PMCPMC11630027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.