ArticleJournal of experimental botany2024
Photosynthesis and photoprotection in top leaves respond faster to irradiance fluctuations than bottom leaves in a tomato canopy.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using ΦPSII and leaf temperature as indicators of non-steady-state photosynthesis and stomatal conductance during stepwise changes in light intensity.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Landscape of plastid DNA breaks in Arabidopsis during development and environmental stimulus.The Plant cell · 2026Article
- Leaf aging reduces photosynthetic and stomatal kinetics under fluctuating irradiance, but not steady-state traits.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Reasonable Planting Density and Chemical Regulation Can Improve the Plant Morphological Characteristics of Grain Maize, Enhance Lodging Resistance and Increase Yield in the Hexi Oasis.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Variation of leaf photosynthetic traits is mostly driven by changes in source-sink relationship rather than irradiance in pear tree canopies.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Stomatal conductance dominates the limitation of photosynthetic induction across leaf developmental stages in foxglove.Photosynthesis research · 2025Article
- Tomato in the spotlight: light regulation of whole-plant physiology.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Review
- Time-resolved targeted metabolomics shows an abrupt switch from Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle to tricarboxylic acid cycle when the light is turned off.Photosynthesis research · 2025Article
- Shining light on photosynthesis.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Article
- Distribution of glucosinolates and antioxidants in different leaf-layers of Kale (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accounting for the dynamic responses of photosynthesis and photoprotection to naturally fluctuating irradiance can improve predictions of plant performance in the field, but the variation of these dynamics within crop canopies is poorly understood. We conducted a detailed study of dynamic and steady-state photosynthesis, photoprotection, leaf pigmentation, and stomatal anatomy in four leaf layers (100, 150, 200, and 250 cm from the floor) of a fully grown tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Foundation) canopy in a greenhouse. We found that leaves at the top of the canopy exhibited higher photosynthetic capacity and slightly faster photosynthetic induction compared with lower-canopy leaves, accompanied by higher stomatal conductance and a faster activation of carboxylation and linear electron transport capacities. In upper-canopy leaves, non-photochemical quenching showed faster induction and relaxation after increases and decreases in irradiance, allowing for more effective photoprotection in these leaves. Despite these observed differences in transient responses between leaf layers, steady-state rather than dynamic photosynthesis traits were more influential for predicting photosynthesis under fluctuating irradiance. Also, a model analysis revealed that time-averaged photosynthesis under fluctuating irradiance could be accurately predicted by one set of Rubisco activation/deactivation parameters across all four leaf layers, thereby greatly simplifying future modelling efforts of whole-canopy photosynthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.