Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39171509›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2024

Equivalence of freeze-dried and liquid-frozen formulations of MVA-BN as smallpox and mpox vaccine.

Richard N Greenberg, Darja Schmidt, Daniela Reichhardt, Siegfried Roesch, Sanja Vidojkovic, Jane Maclennan, Liddy M Chen, Robert Gruenert, Christian Kreusel, Heinz Weidenthaler and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Promising Vaccine Formulations for Emerging Infectious Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Richard N GreenbergDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Kentucky School of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Darja SchmidtClinical Testing, Quality Control Munich, Bavarian Nordic GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Daniela ReichhardtClinical Operations, CatalYm GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Siegfried RoeschClinical Operations, Topas Therapeutics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Sanja VidojkovicClinical Testing, Quality Control Munich, Bavarian Nordic GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Jane MaclennanClinical Testing, Quality Control Munich, Bavarian Nordic GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Liddy M ChenClinical Biometrics, Bavarian Nordic Inc, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6569-9674
Robert GruenertClinical Testing, Quality Control Munich, Bavarian Nordic GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Christian KreuselClinical Testing, Quality Control Munich, Bavarian Nordic GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Heinz WeidenthalerClinical Testing, Quality Control Munich, Bavarian Nordic GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Thomas P H MeyerInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Paul John ChaplinExecutive Management, Bavarian Nordic A/S, Hellerup, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modified Vaccinia Ankara Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) as a smallpox and mpox vaccine has been approved in its liquid-frozen (LF) formulation in the US, Canada, and EU. A freeze-dried (FD) formulation may offer additional benefits, such as a longer shelf life and reduced dependence on cold chain storage and transport. In a phase 2 clinical trial, 651 vaccinia-naïve participants were vaccinated with two doses of MVA-BN LF or FD, 4 weeks apart. The objectives were to compare MVA-BN FD with LF in terms of vaccine-induced immune responses, safety, and reactogenicity. Non-inferiority of the immune response was assessed by the 95% CI of the geometric mean ratios. Both formulations induced robust vaccinia-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. At peak humoral responses (Week 6), geometric means of total antibody titers were 1096 (95% CI 1013, 1186) from the FD group and 877 (95% CI 804, 956) from the LF group, achieving the primary endpoint of non-inferiority of MVA-BN FD compared to MVA-BN LF. At peak cellular responses (Week 2), geometric means of T cell spot forming units were 449 (95% CI 341, 590) from the FD group and 316 (95% CI 234, 427) from the LF group. Both formulations of MVA-BN were well tolerated, with similar unsolicited AEs and solicited systemic reactions in both groups but slightly more local reactions in the FD group. No vaccine-related serious adverse events (SAEs) or vaccine-related AE of special interest were reported. The FD formulation of MVA-BN was shown to be equivalent to MVA-BN LF.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralFreeze DryingSmallpox VaccineAdolescentAdultFemaleFreezingHumansImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralMaleMiddle AgedMpox, MonkeypoxSmallpoxVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAAntibodies, Viralsmallpox and monkeypox vaccine modified vaccinia ankara-bavarian nordicSmallpox VaccineVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAfreeze-driedModified vaccinia Ankaramonkeypoxmpoxorthopox virussmallpoxvaccine

Identifiers

PMID39171509
PMCPMC11346558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.