Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39171499›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2024

From both sides of the needle: Understanding effective interventions for facilitating non-national immunization program vaccine decision making in China.

Mingzhu Jiang, Xuanxuan Yan, Weixi Jiang, Haifeng Ma, Sijuan Zhou, Xiaohua Ying

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mingzhu JiangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xuanxuan YanSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Weixi JiangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Haifeng MaSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Sijuan ZhouSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaohua YingSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination decisions are influenced by various psychological and practical factors. In China, non-National Immunization Program (non-NIP) vaccines, which are voluntary and self-paid, add uncertainty and autonomy to the decision-making process. Effective communication between providers and recipients is crucial but understudied. This study aims to integrate their perspectives, identify strategies for facilitating vaccination decisions, and analyze their mechanisms. From July to December 2023, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 caregivers and 12 vaccination providers across five Chinese provinces. Participants shared their experiences and decision-making processes regarding non-NIP vaccines. The Behaviour Change Wheel framework guided the analysis, utilizing iterative coding and directed content analysis. Thirteen Behavior Change Techniques were identified, with feedback, monitoring, and environmental restructuring being the most common. Key intervention functions included Persuasion, Education, and Training. We further mapped how these interventions influence non-NIP vaccine decisions. Capability was enhanced through education and effective communication, providing necessary knowledge and skills. Opportunity was increased via infrastructural improvements and societal support, making vaccines more accessible and endorsed by the community. Motivation was driven by clear communication of vaccination benefits and risks, reinforced by societal norms through public health messaging. By understanding the mechanisms influencing vaccination behaviors and interacting with stakeholders, tailored strategies can be developed. Healthcare providers can enhance service accessibility and offer evidence-based guidance with reminders, monitoring, and incentives to ensure compliance. For recipients, reliable information, sustained engagement, timely communication, and motivational opportunities are essential. A multi-dimensional approach involving multiple stakeholders is crucial for promoting non-NIP vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

Decision MakingImmunization ProgramsVaccinationAdultCaregiversChinaCommunicationFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedVaccinesVaccinesBehaviour change wheelChinain-depth interviewnon-NIP vaccinesvaccination

Identifiers

PMID39171499
PMCPMC11346547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.