Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39171362›Full record

Trial reportOrthopaedic surgery2024

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Cementless vs. Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

Enze Zhao, Xiaoyan Zhu, Haiwei Tang, Zhenyu Luo, Weinan Zeng, Zongke Zhou

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cementless total knee arthroplasty: Why, when, and how.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Enze Zhao *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyan Zhu *West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Haiwei TangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Zhenyu LuoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Weinan ZengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Zongke ZhouDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9037-4756

Funding

1.3.5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University 2023HXFH0121.3.5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZYGD23033National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2503100National Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational Research 2022YFC2503104National Nature Science Foundation of China 82172394National Nature Science Foundation of China U22A20280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrevious cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs faced challenges with insufficient initial fixation on tibial side, resulting in inferior functional outcomes and survival rates. The Zoned Trabecular Bone Cementless Knee is a novel implant designed for cementless TKA which aims to achieve excellent initial fixation, promoting effective osseointegration. The aim of this research was to compare the early clinical and radiographic results of this cementless TKA with cemented TKA.

methodsBetween September 2021 and April 2022, 64 patients (64 knees) were recruited in this prospective randomized controlled trial to receive either cementless 3D-printed trabecular metal TKA or a cemented posterior stabilized TKA. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations, including the range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Reduced Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Score (WOMAC), were conducted and analyzed for comparison. Radiographs and computed tomography scans were utilized to assess the initial fixation. The complications between the two groups were also recorded and compared. Continuous data were analyzed for significance using independent-samples t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test and categorical data were analyzed using chi-squared or Fisher's exact test.

resultsBoth groups demonstrated significant enhancement at 12 months follow-up in the ROM compared with baseline (ROM: 94.7 ± 23.4 vs. 113.1 ± 12.3 in cementless group and 96.5 ± 14.7 vs. 111.0 ± 12.8 in cemented group, p < 0.05). However, no statistical differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative ROM, KSS, or WOMAC score. The radiographs and computed tomography scans showed similar results, including radiolucent lines and osteolysis in either femoral or tibial. Additionally, there was no statistical difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups. Notably, one patient in the cementless TKA group required revision for periprosthetic infection as the end point.

conclusionsThis novel 3D-printed trabecular metal cementless TKA achieved comparable clinical outcomes and initial fixation to cemented TKA in early stage. Longer-term examination is necessary to validate these results.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisAgedBone CementsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrinting, Three-DimensionalProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, ArticularBone Cements3D PrintingCementedCementlessTotal Knee ArthroplastyTrabecular Metal Components

Identifiers

PMID39171362
PMCPMC11541117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.