Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39171245›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Interventions to Reduce Surgical Waste Burden: A Systematic Review.

Cindy Vu, Alejandra Ibarra-Vega, Christopher D Yang, Karlos Manzanarez-Felix, Caleb L Ting, Mikhail Pakvasa, Raj M Vyas, Miles J Pfaff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Ditch the drapes: Non-sterile substitution in proctology, a population-based cost and carbon life cycle analysis with early implementation audit.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Implementation of a Safe Cost Reduction Strategy for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cindy VuFrom the Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Calif.
Alejandra Ibarra-VegaFrom the Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Calif.
Christopher D YangFrom the Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Calif.
Karlos Manzanarez-FelixFrom the Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Calif.
Caleb L TingRiverside School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Calif.
Mikhail PakvasaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, Calif.
Raj M VyasFrom the Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Calif.
Miles J PfaffFrom the Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Calif.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Operating suites are significant drivers of waste, pollution, and costs. Surgeons can help fight the climate crisis by implementing innovative strategies aimed at mitigating the environmental impact of surgical procedures and decreasing operational costs, and moving toward a more sustainable healthcare system. This study aims to review the literature describing interventions that reduce surgical waste. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched. Studies reporting interventions to reduce operative waste, including emissions, energy, trash, and other, were included. Case reports, opinion-based reports, reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. Study quality was rated using MINORS and Jadad scales. Data were extracted from each study to calculate waste on a per case basis. Narrative review of studies was performed rather than meta-analysis. Results: The search yielded 675 unique hits, of which 13 (level of evidence: I-III) met inclusion criteria. Included studies were categorized by intervention type in relation to the operating and procedure room. Three studies evaluated provider education initiatives, three evaluated setup of instruments, two evaluated single-use items, four evaluated technique changes, and one evaluated surgical venue. Seven studies reported significant reductions in disposable surgical waste throughput, and seven reported significant reductions in cost. Conclusions: The results of this systemic review demonstrated the effectiveness of surgical waste reduction initiatives in reducing waste volume, cost, and carbon emissions. Within plastic surgery, minimal surgical packs resulted in reduced gross waste and cost while promoting patient satisfaction in hand surgery, supporting the continued development and implementation of such initiatives in a surgical context.

Identifiers

PMID39171245
PMCPMC11338262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.