Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39171046›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Deep Learning Algorithms for the Detection of Suspicious Pigmented Skin Lesions in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ahmed R Abdalla, Ahmed W Hageen, Haneen H Saleh, Omar Al-Azzawi, Mahmoud Ghalab, Amani Harraz, Bola S Eldoqsh, Fatma E Elawady, Ayman H Alhammadi, Hesham Hassan Elmorsy and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ahmed R AbdallaVascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, EGY.
Ahmed W HageenFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, EGY.
Haneen H SalehFaculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Omar Al-AzzawiFaculty of Pharmacy, İstinye University, İstanbul, TUR.
Mahmoud GhalabRadiology Department, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh, EGY.
Amani HarrazFaculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EGY.
Bola S EldoqshFaculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, EGY.
Fatma E ElawadyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Port Said Specialized Hospital of Ophthalmology, Port Said, EGY.
Ayman H AlhammadiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EGY.
Hesham Hassan ElmorsyFaculty of Pharmacy, Helwan University, Helwan, EGY.
Majd JanoResearch Department, Syrian Society for Physicians and Pharmacists, Frankfurt, DEU.
Mohamed ElmasryFaculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EGY.
Eshak I BahbahFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Damietta, EGY.
Ahmed ElgebalySmart Health Centre, University of East London, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of suspicious pigmented skin lesions is crucial for improving the outcomes and survival rates of skin cancers. However, the accuracy of clinical diagnosis by primary care physicians (PCPs) is suboptimal, leading to unnecessary referrals and biopsies. In recent years, deep learning (DL) algorithms have shown promising results in the automated detection and classification of skin lesions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DL algorithms for the detection of suspicious pigmented skin lesions in primary care settings. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science. Data from eligible studies were extracted, including study characteristics, sample size, algorithm type, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Three studies were included. The results showed that DL algorithms had a high sensitivity (90%, 95% CI: 90-91%) and specificity (85%, 95% CI: 84-86%) for detecting suspicious pigmented skin lesions in primary care settings. Significant heterogeneity was observed in both sensitivity (p = 0.0062, I

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdetectionmelanomascreening

Identifiers

PMID39171046
PMCPMC11338545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.