Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39171029›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Influence of Crown Height and Width on Marginal Bone Loss and Long-Term Stability of Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.

Ritul Jain, Sweta G Pisulkar, Surekha A Dubey, Akansha Bansod, Arushi Beri, Shruti Deshmukh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ritul JainDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Sweta G PisulkarDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Surekha A DubeyDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Akansha BansodDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Arushi BeriDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Shruti DeshmukhDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Still, a major focus of research in implantology is how crown height and width affect marginal bone loss (MBL) and the long-term durability of dental implants. Maximizing the success of implants and lowering problems depends on an awareness of these elements. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this systematic review searched pertinent studies across several databases using keywords unique to databases. Studies on MBL and long-term implant stability evaluated in the review included those on crown height and width, horizontal and vertical cantilevers, and prosthesis dimensions. In the chosen studies, we found that both implant success and crestal bone loss were greatly influenced by crown height and width. Particularly in the posterior sections, horizontal cantilevers were connected to both increasing MBL and mechanical problems. Vertical cantilevers also affected MBL; however, their impacts were more obvious in circumstances with greater crown heights. Greater prosthesis widths, especially in the mandibular molar area, were linked to higher MBL. Bone density and insertion torque (IT) were the main determinants of MBL, more than the primary implant stability quotient. Early MBL was influenced by abutment height, mucosal thickness, and implant insertion depth; bone levels stabilized six months later. Short implants allow single crowns to be supported, but in some cases, a higher failure rate was seen. The success and stability of dental implants were found to be mostly dependent on crown height, width, and cantilever design. MBL and long-term stability are greatly influenced by horizontal and vertical cantilevers, which calls for careful design and planning. With specific care for bone density, IT, and early MBL stabilization, both short and standard implants can produce equivalent results. These results highlight the need for customized treatment plans to maximize implant success and lifetime.

Indexed as

bone densitycrown heightcrown-implant ratiocrown widthdental implantsimplant stabilitymarginal bone lossshort implants

Identifiers

PMID39171029
PMCPMC11338648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.