ReviewCureus2024
Comprehensive Review of Surgical and Radiological Management of Hemorrhagic Pancreatitis: Current Strategies and Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to splenic artery pseudoaneurysm combined with pancreatic pseudocyst recurrence: A case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Discordance between CECT and angiographic findings in severe acute pancreatitis-related hemorrhage: implications for interventional management.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Successful Surgical Treatment of Hemosuccus Pancreaticus Caused by Rupture of a Transverse Pancreatic Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Hemorrhage from a pancreatic pseudocyst eroding the stomach, diaphragm, and splenic artery: a case report on integrated surgical and nursing management.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Telling Ghost Stories Around a Bonfire-A Literature Review of Acute Bleeding Secondary to Pancreatitis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemorrhagic pancreatitis, a severe complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis, involves bleeding due to vascular disruptions. This condition presents significant clinical challenges and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The bleeding can result from arterial or venous complications, often exacerbated by inflammatory and enzymatic damage to blood vessels within the pancreas. Patients with hemorrhagic pancreatitis may experience symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Diagnostic imaging, including CT and MRI, is crucial in identifying the source of bleeding and guiding treatment decisions. Management strategies have evolved over the past two decades, shifting from purely surgical approaches to including interventional radiology techniques. Surgical intervention is often reserved for hemodynamically unstable patients or those with large pseudoaneurysms, offering definitive treatment but carrying higher risks of complications. Endovascular techniques, such as transcatheter embolization, provide a less invasive alternative with high success rates and shorter recovery times, though rebleeding may occur. Treatment choice depends on various factors, including the patient's stability, the size and location of the bleeding, and the availability of specialized expertise. Overall, the management of hemorrhagic pancreatitis requires a multidisciplinary approach, combining surgical and radiological techniques to optimize patient outcomes and reduce the risk of mortality. Long-term follow-up is essential to monitor for recurrent disease and manage the metabolic consequences of pancreatic insufficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.