Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170939›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Development and validation of a deep learning-based framework for automated lung CT segmentation and acute respiratory distress syndrome prediction: a multicenter cohort study.

Yang Zhou, Shuya Mei, Jiemin Wang, Qiaoyi Xu, Zhiyun Zhang, Shaojie Qin, Jinhua Feng, Congye Li, Shunpeng Xing, Wei Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yang ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shuya MeiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiemin WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qiaoyi XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhiyun ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shaojie QinDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jinhua FengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Congye LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shunpeng XingDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei WangShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaolin ZhangShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Feng LiShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Quanhong ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhengyu HeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuan GaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition with a high incidence and mortality rate in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Early identification of patients at high risk for developing ARDS is crucial for timely intervention and improved clinical outcomes. However, the complex pathophysiology of ARDS makes early prediction challenging. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for automated lung lesion segmentation and early prediction of ARDS to facilitate timely intervention in the intensive care unit. Methods: A total of 928 ICU patients with chest computed tomography (CT) scans were included from November 2018 to November 2021 at three centers in China. Patients were divided into a retrospective cohort for model development and internal validation, and three independent cohorts for external validation. A deep learning-based framework using the UNet Transformer (UNETR) model was developed to perform the segmentation of lung lesions and early prediction of ARDS. We employed various data augmentation techniques using the Medical Open Network for AI (MONAI) framework, enhancing the training sample diversity and improving the model's generalization capabilities. The performance of the deep learning-based framework was compared with a Densenet-based image classification network and evaluated in external and prospective validation cohorts. The segmentation performance was assessed using the Dice coefficient (DC), and the prediction performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The contributions of different features to ARDS prediction were visualized using Shapley Explanation Plots. This study was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registration Centre (ChiCTR2200058700). Findings: The segmentation task using the deep learning framework achieved a DC of 0.734 ± 0.137 in the validation set. For the prediction task, the deep learning-based framework achieved AUCs of 0.916 [0.858-0.961], 0.865 [0.774-0.945], 0.901 [0.835-0.955], and 0.876 [0.804-0.936] in the internal validation cohort, external validation cohort I, external validation cohort II, and prospective validation cohort, respectively. It outperformed the Densenet-based image classification network in terms of prediction accuracy. Moreover, the ARDS prediction model identified lung lesion features and clinical parameters such as C-reactive protein, albumin, bilirubin, platelet count, and age as significant contributors to ARDS prediction. Interpretation: The deep learning-based framework using the UNETR model demonstrated high accuracy and robustness in lung lesion segmentation and early ARDS prediction, and had good generalization ability and clinical applicability. Funding: This study was supported by grants from the Shanghai Renji Hospital Clinical Research Innovation and Cultivation Fund (RJPY-DZX-008) and Shanghai Science and Technology Development Funds (22YF1423300).

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndromeAutomated lung CT segmentationDeep learningPredictionUNet Transformer model

Identifiers

PMID39170939
PMCPMC11338113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.