ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Development and validation of a deep learning-based framework for automated lung CT segmentation and acute respiratory distress syndrome prediction: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): epidemiology, etiology, molecular mechanisms, diagnosis and therapeutic strategies.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Deep learning-assisted creation of a large-scale cone beam computed tomography dataset for the segmentation of impacted mandibular third molar.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning methods based on oscillometry and electric modeling for the diagnostic of respiratory dysfunction in silicosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- CT-based AI system for quantitative and integrated management of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critical care.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Computed tomography in ARDS, from morphological insights to AI-powered multi-modal analysis: a narrative review.Journal of intensive care · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a prediction model for respiratory complications and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Characterizing heterogeneity and subphenotyping acute respiratory distress syndrome with computed tomography.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Review
- Machine learning in ARDS: an intensivist's guide to artificial intelligence applications.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Model for Predicting Postoperative Hyperlactatemia in Young Children Following Congenital Heart Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing ocular sign detection: AI-based strategic segmentation for improved accuracy and privacy protection.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Multimodal Artificial Intelligence for Precision Critical Care: A Scoping Review.Health data science · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a predictive model for postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with type A aortic dissection based on the 2023 updated definition.Respiratory research · 2025Article
- Enhancing mortality prediction in intensive care units: improving APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS II scoring systems using long short-term memory.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Habitat-based transformer model in pretreatmentBMC cancer · 2025Article
- A Cohort Study of Pediatric Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia Involving AI-Based CT Image Parameters and Electronic Health Record Data.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Article
- End-to-end deep learning for the diagnosis of pelvic and sacral tumors using non-enhanced MRI: a multi-center study.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Omics approach to chest electrical impedance tomography reveals physiological cluster of ARDS characterised by increased respiratory drive and effort.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
- A machine learning model for predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome risk in patients with sepsis using circulating immune cell parameters: a retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Novel lung imaging techniques: new experimental insights in acute respiratory failure.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition with a high incidence and mortality rate in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Early identification of patients at high risk for developing ARDS is crucial for timely intervention and improved clinical outcomes. However, the complex pathophysiology of ARDS makes early prediction challenging. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for automated lung lesion segmentation and early prediction of ARDS to facilitate timely intervention in the intensive care unit. Methods: A total of 928 ICU patients with chest computed tomography (CT) scans were included from November 2018 to November 2021 at three centers in China. Patients were divided into a retrospective cohort for model development and internal validation, and three independent cohorts for external validation. A deep learning-based framework using the UNet Transformer (UNETR) model was developed to perform the segmentation of lung lesions and early prediction of ARDS. We employed various data augmentation techniques using the Medical Open Network for AI (MONAI) framework, enhancing the training sample diversity and improving the model's generalization capabilities. The performance of the deep learning-based framework was compared with a Densenet-based image classification network and evaluated in external and prospective validation cohorts. The segmentation performance was assessed using the Dice coefficient (DC), and the prediction performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The contributions of different features to ARDS prediction were visualized using Shapley Explanation Plots. This study was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registration Centre (ChiCTR2200058700). Findings: The segmentation task using the deep learning framework achieved a DC of 0.734 ± 0.137 in the validation set. For the prediction task, the deep learning-based framework achieved AUCs of 0.916 [0.858-0.961], 0.865 [0.774-0.945], 0.901 [0.835-0.955], and 0.876 [0.804-0.936] in the internal validation cohort, external validation cohort I, external validation cohort II, and prospective validation cohort, respectively. It outperformed the Densenet-based image classification network in terms of prediction accuracy. Moreover, the ARDS prediction model identified lung lesion features and clinical parameters such as C-reactive protein, albumin, bilirubin, platelet count, and age as significant contributors to ARDS prediction. Interpretation: The deep learning-based framework using the UNETR model demonstrated high accuracy and robustness in lung lesion segmentation and early ARDS prediction, and had good generalization ability and clinical applicability. Funding: This study was supported by grants from the Shanghai Renji Hospital Clinical Research Innovation and Cultivation Fund (RJPY-DZX-008) and Shanghai Science and Technology Development Funds (22YF1423300).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.