ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2024
Frequency of splenectomy for pediatric splenic injury in Brazil: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical analysis on comparison of outcomes between partial splenic artery embolization and splenectomy for management of grade II-III splenic injury in blunt trauma.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Abandoning scientific colonization in pediatric global surgery: breaking barriers in knowledge dissemination to close gaps in surgical care.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-operative management for pediatric blunt splenic injury is well established in high-income countries, leading to a low splenectomy rate in hemodynamically stable children. Splenectomy rate became a quality indicator for Trauma Center verification utilized by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. However, data on splenectomy rate in children from countries with different income levels, such as Brazil, remain limited. This study aimed to assess the post-traumatic splenectomy rate among Brazilian children over the past decade and the relation with local resources. Methods: Data on pediatric splenic injuries and splenectomies from 2008 to 2019, including patient age and admitting service (adult or pediatric), were obtained from FioCruz database, a public, free, cloud-based platform that offers extensive national health data. The regional numbers of pediatric surgeons, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) beds, and computed tomography scanners were obtained from Brazilian national databases. A national analysis of splenectomy rate by year and service of admission and an analysis of splenectomy rate by the level of regional resources, the number of pediatric surgeons, PICU beds, and computed tomography scanners was performed. Findings: 4061 children were hospitalized with a splenic injury, and 2287 (51.8%) of them underwent splenectomy, unchanged over time. 76.8% were male and 23.1% female patients with splenic injury. Mean age was 11.61 years old. The odds of splenectomy was 14.77 times higher for pediatric patients admitted under adult surgical service compared to pediatric service (OR = 14.77, 95% CI 11.75-18.56, p < 0.0001). The overall increase in pediatric surgeons, PICU beds, and CT scanner availability did not correspond with changes in splenectomy rate. Interpretation: The post-traumatic splenectomy rate among Brazilian children is high, far exceeding that of high-income countries. Increased regional pediatric resources did not correspond to a decrease in splenectomy rate. Further research is essential to understand Brazil's barriers to adopting non-operative management for pediatric splenic injuries. Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.